Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35010959›Full record

SynthesisNutrients2021

Probiotic Supplementation for Promotion of Growth in Children: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Joseph Catania, Natasha G Pandit, Julie M Ehrlich, Muizz Zaman, Elizabeth Stone, Courtney Franceschi, Abigail Smith, Emily Tanner-Smith, Joseph P Zackular, Zulfiqar A Bhutta and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Nutrients, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. The gut microbiota in malnutrition.Nature reviews. Microbiology · 2026
    Review
  7. Review
  8. Neonatal faecal abundance ofGut microbiome (Cambridge, England) · 2026
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Joseph CataniaCollege of Medicine, SUNY Upstate Medical University, Syracuse, NY 13210, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-1551-981X
Natasha G PanditCollege of Medicine, SUNY Upstate Medical University, Syracuse, NY 13210, USA.
Julie M EhrlichCollege of Medicine, SUNY Upstate Medical University, Syracuse, NY 13210, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-8636-2640
Muizz ZamanCollege of Medicine, SUNY Upstate Medical University, Syracuse, NY 13210, USA.
Elizabeth StoneCollege of Medicine, SUNY Upstate Medical University, Syracuse, NY 13210, USA.
Courtney FranceschiCollege of Medicine, SUNY Upstate Medical University, Syracuse, NY 13210, USA.
Abigail SmithHealth Science Library, SUNY Upstate Medical University, Syracuse, NY 13210, USA.
Emily Tanner-SmithCollege of Education, University of Oregon, Eugene, OR 97403, USA.
Joseph P ZackularDepartment of Pathology, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA.
Zulfiqar A BhuttaCentre for Global Child Health, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, ON M5G 0A4, Canada.ORCID 0000-0003-0637-599X
Aamer ImdadDepartment of Pediatrics, Division of Pediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition, SUNY Upstate Medical University, Syracuse, NY 13210, USA.
SUNY Upstate Medical University · USAga Khan University · PKChildren's Hospital of Philadelphia · USUniversity of Oregon · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Probiotics are commonly prescribed to promote a healthy gut microbiome in children. Our objective was to investigate the effects of probiotic supplementation on growth outcomes in children 0-59 months of age. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis which included randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that administered probiotics to children aged 0-59 months, with growth outcomes as a result. We completed a random-effects meta-analysis and calculated a pooled standardized mean difference (SMD) or relative risk (RR) and reported with a 95% confidence interval (CI). We included 79 RCTs, 54 from high-income countries (HIC), and 25 from low- and middle-income countries (LMIC). LMIC data showed that probiotics may have a small effect on weight (SMD: 0.26, 95% CI: 0.11-0.42, grade-certainty = low) and height (SMD 0.16, 95% CI: 0.06-0.25, grade-certainty = moderate). HIC data did not show any clinically meaningful effect on weight (SMD: 0.01, 95% CI: -0.04-0.05, grade-certainty = moderate), or height (SMD: -0.01, 95% CI: -0.06-0.04, grade-certainty = moderate). There was no evidence that probiotics affected the risk of adverse events. We conclude that in otherwise healthy children aged 0-59 months, probiotics may have a small but heterogenous effect on weight and height in LMIC but not in children from HIC.

Indexed as

Dietary SupplementsChild DevelopmentChild, PreschoolHumansInfantInfant, NewbornProbioticsgrowthhigh-income countrieslow- and middle-income countriesprobioticssynbioticssystematic review

Identifiers

PMID35010959
PMCPMC8746675
OpenAlexW3210651809

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.