Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35010817›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2022

Direct Access to Physical Therapy: Should Italy Move Forward?

Filippo Maselli, Leonardo Piano, Simone Cecchetto, Lorenzo Storari, Giacomo Rossettini, Firas Mourad

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed
12.8field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 47 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Observational
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Filippo MaselliDepartment of Neurosciences, Rehabilitation, Ophthalmology, Genetic and Maternal Infantile Sciences (DINOGMI), Campus of Savona, University of Genova, 17100 Savona, Italy.
Leonardo PianoFondazione dei Santi Lorenzo e Teobaldo, 12050 Rodello, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-9010-3745
Simone CecchettoDirection of Health Professions, APSS, 38014 Trento, Italy.
Lorenzo StorariDepartment of Neurosciences, Rehabilitation, Ophthalmology, Genetic and Maternal Infantile Sciences (DINOGMI), Campus of Savona, University of Genova, 17100 Savona, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-4848-4262
Giacomo RossettiniSchool of Physiotherapy, University of Verona, 37129 Verona, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-1623-7681
Firas MouradDepartment of Physiotherapy, LUNEX International University of Health, Exercise and Sports, 4671 Luxembourg, Luxembourg.ORCID 0000-0002-8981-2085
Agenzia Regionale Sanitaria della Puglia · ITUniversity of Verona · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Direct access to physical therapy (DAPT) is the patient's ability to self-refer to a physical therapist, without previous consultation from any other professional. This model of care has been implemented in many healthcare systems since it has demonstrated better outcomes than traditional models of care. The model of DAPT mainly focuses on the management of musculoskeletal disorders, with a huge epidemiological burden and worldwide healthcare systems workload. Among the healthcare professionals, physical therapists are one of the most accessed for managing pain and disability related to musculoskeletal disorders. Additionally, the most updated guidelines recommend DAPT as a first-line treatment because of its cost-effectiveness, safety, and patients' satisfaction compared to other interventions. DAPT was also adopted to efficiently face the diffuse crisis of the declining number of general practitioners, reducing their caseload by directly managing patients' musculoskeletal disorders traditionally seen by general practitioners. World Physiotherapy organization also advocates DAPT as a new approach, with physical therapy in a primary care pathway to better control healthcare expenses. Thus, it is unclear why the Italian institutions have decided to recognize new professions instead of focusing on the growth of physical therapy, a long-established and autonomous health profession. Furthermore, it is unclear why DAPT is still not fully recognized, considering the historical context and its evidence. The future is now: although still preliminary, the evidence supporting DAPT is promising. Hard skills, academic paths, scientific evidence, and the legislature argue that this paradigm shift should occur in Italy.

Indexed as

Physical TherapistsPhysical Therapy ModalitiesHealth Services AccessibilityHumansPrimary Health CareReferral and Consultationcost-effectivenessdirect accessorthopedic manipulative physical therapyphysical therapyscope of practice

Identifiers

PMID35010817
PMCPMC8744939
OpenAlexW4205469952

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.