Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35010808›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2022

Analysis of the Consumption of Drugs Prescribed for the Treatment of Asthma in Belgian Children.

Natacha Biset, Wies Kestens, Dominique Detemmerman, Murielle Lona, Güngör Karakaya, Ann Ceuppens, Stéphanie Pochet, Carine De Vriese

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 40% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Natacha BisetDepartment of Pharmacotherapy and Pharmaceutics, Faculté de Pharmacie, Université Libre de Bruxelles (ULB), 1050 Brussels, Belgium.
Wies KestensDepartment of Studies & Innovation, Mutualités Libres-Onafhankelijke Ziekenfondsen, 1070 Brussels, Belgium.
Dominique DetemmermanDepartment of Studies & Innovation, Mutualités Libres-Onafhankelijke Ziekenfondsen, 1070 Brussels, Belgium.
Murielle LonaDepartment of Studies & Innovation, Mutualités Libres-Onafhankelijke Ziekenfondsen, 1070 Brussels, Belgium.
Güngör KarakayaDepartment of Studies & Innovation, Mutualités Libres-Onafhankelijke Ziekenfondsen, 1070 Brussels, Belgium.
Ann CeuppensDepartment of Studies & Innovation, Mutualités Libres-Onafhankelijke Ziekenfondsen, 1070 Brussels, Belgium.
Stéphanie PochetDepartment of Pharmacotherapy and Pharmaceutics, Faculté de Pharmacie, Université Libre de Bruxelles (ULB), 1050 Brussels, Belgium.
Carine De VrieseDepartment of Pharmacotherapy and Pharmaceutics, Faculté de Pharmacie, Université Libre de Bruxelles (ULB), 1050 Brussels, Belgium.
Landsbond der Christelijke Mutualiteiten (Belgium) · BEUniversité Libre de Bruxelles · BE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

(1) Asthma is one of the most common chronic diseases in the world among children. The main purpose of this study was to analyze the consumption of asthma medications in order to investigate asthma in children (2-18 years) and the association with health care consumption; (2) a retrospective study using anonymized administrative data for 2013-2018 from the third largest Belgian health insurer was conducted; (3) in 2018, 12.9% of children received at least one asthma medication and 4.4% received at least two packages with a minimum of 30 days between purchases. Preschool children (2-6 years) were three times more likely to take asthma medication than older children (7-18 years). ICS, in combination or not with LABA, were the most dispensed drugs among children. Children with asthma medications were almost twice as likely to receive antibiotics, more likely to end up in the emergency room, and twice as likely to be hospitalized; (4) most children took ICS, according to the GINA guidelines. High rates of nebulization in young children were observed, despite the recommendation to use an inhaler with a spacing chamber as much as possible. Finally, children who took asthma medications were more likely to end up in the ER or be hospitalized.

Indexed as

Anti-Asthmatic AgentsAsthmaPharmaceutical PreparationsAdministration, InhalationAdolescentAdrenal Cortex HormonesBelgiumChildChild, PreschoolDrug Therapy, CombinationHumansRetrospective StudiesAdrenal Cortex HormonesAnti-Asthmatic AgentsPharmaceutical Preparationsasthmachildrenrespiratory diseasetreatment

Identifiers

PMID35010808
PMCPMC8744625
OpenAlexW4205953929

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.