Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35010658›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2021

Near-Peer Teaching in Human Anatomy from a Tutors' Perspective: An Eighteen-Year-Old Experience at the University of Bologna.

Ester Orsini, Marilisa Quaranta, Giulia Adalgisa Mariani, Sara Mongiorgi, Lucio Cocco, Anna Maria Billi, Lucia Manzoli, Stefano Ratti

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Collaborative Learning Communities With Medical Students as Teachers.Journal of medical education and curricular development
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Ester OrsiniDepartment of Biomedical and Neuromotor Sciences, Human Anatomy Section, University of Bologna, via Irnerio 48, 40126 Bologna, Italy.
Marilisa QuarantaDepartment of Biomedical and Neuromotor Sciences, Human Anatomy Section, University of Bologna, via Irnerio 48, 40126 Bologna, Italy.
Giulia Adalgisa MarianiDepartment of Biomedical and Neuromotor Sciences, Human Anatomy Section, University of Bologna, via Irnerio 48, 40126 Bologna, Italy.
Sara MongiorgiDepartment of Biomedical and Neuromotor Sciences, Human Anatomy Section, University of Bologna, via Irnerio 48, 40126 Bologna, Italy.
Lucio CoccoDepartment of Biomedical and Neuromotor Sciences, Human Anatomy Section, University of Bologna, via Irnerio 48, 40126 Bologna, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-9206-8277
Anna Maria BilliDepartment of Biomedical and Neuromotor Sciences, Human Anatomy Section, University of Bologna, via Irnerio 48, 40126 Bologna, Italy.
Lucia ManzoliDepartment of Biomedical and Neuromotor Sciences, Human Anatomy Section, University of Bologna, via Irnerio 48, 40126 Bologna, Italy.
Stefano RattiDepartment of Biomedical and Neuromotor Sciences, Human Anatomy Section, University of Bologna, via Irnerio 48, 40126 Bologna, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-6258-5345

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The University of Bologna School of Medicine in 2003 adopted a near-peer teaching (NPT) program with senior medical students teaching and assisting younger students in human anatomy laboratories. This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness and outcomes of this program-unique on the Italian academic panorama-from the tutors' perspective. An anonymous online survey was administered to all those who acted as peer tutors in the period from 2003 to 2021; it evaluated tutors' perceptions regarding the influence of the tutoring experience on their skillset gains, academic performance, and professional career. Furthermore, tutors were asked to express their views on the value of cadaver dissection in medical education and professional development. The overall perception of the NPT program was overwhelmingly positive and the main reported benefits were improved long-term knowledge retention and academic performance, improved communication, team-working and time management skills, and enhanced self-confidence and motivation. Most tutors strongly believed that cadaver dissection was an invaluable learning tool in medical education, helped them to develop professionalism and human values, and positively influenced the caring of their future patients. Nearly all the participants highlighted the importance of voluntary body donation for medical education and research. The present results supported the thesis that tutors themselves benefited from the act of teaching peers; this impactful experience equipped them with a wide range of transferable skills that they could draw on as future educators and healthcare professionals.

Indexed as

Education, MedicalStudents, MedicalAdolescentHumansLearningMotivationPeer GroupTeachingcadaver dissectionhuman anatomylearningmedical schoolnear-peer teaching

Identifiers

PMID35010658
PMCPMC8744748

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.