Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35010550›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2021

Virtual World Café Method for Identifying Mental Health Research Priorities: Methodological Case Study.

Michelle Banfield, Amelia Gulliver, Alyssa R Morse

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. A World Café Approach to Exploring Perspectives on Diabetes Stigma in the United Kingdom.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2024
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Supporting early-career dementia researchers: Identifying support needs and ways forward via a European study.Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association · 2024
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Keeping the Agenda Current: Evolution of Australian Lived Experience Mental Health Research Priorities.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Michelle BanfieldCentre for Mental Health Research, Research School of Population Health, The Australian National University, Acton, ACT 2601, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-3024-1687
Amelia GulliverCentre for Mental Health Research, Research School of Population Health, The Australian National University, Acton, ACT 2601, Australia.
Alyssa R MorseCentre for Mental Health Research, Research School of Population Health, The Australian National University, Acton, ACT 2601, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

People with lived experience of mental health problems as both consumers and carers can bring significant expertise to the research process. However, the methods used to gather this information and their subsequent results can vary markedly. This paper describes the methods for two virtual World Cafés held to gather data on consumer and carer priorities for mental health research. Several methodological processes and challenges arose during data collection, including the achieved recruitment for each group (

Indexed as

Mental HealthMental Health ServicesCaregiversHumansResearch Designinternetmental healthmethodsqualitative research

Identifiers

PMID35010550
PMCPMC8744911

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.