Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35010501›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2021

Does the COVID-19 Vaccine Still Work That "Most of the Confirmed Cases Had Been Vaccinated"? A Content Analysis of Vaccine Effectiveness Discussion on Sina Weibo during the Outbreak of COVID-19 in Nanjing.

Hao Gao, Qingting Zhao, Chuanlin Ning, Difan Guo, Jing Wu, Lina Li

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Hao GaoSchool of Journalism and Communication, Nanjing Normal University, Nanjing 210097, China.ORCID 0000-0002-9749-008X
Qingting ZhaoSchool of Journalism and Communication, Nanjing Normal University, Nanjing 210097, China.
Chuanlin NingSchool of Media and Communication, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai 200240, China.ORCID 0000-0002-5545-4910
Difan GuoSchool of Journalism and Communication, Nanjing Normal University, Nanjing 210097, China.ORCID 0000-0002-0048-985X
Jing WuFaculty of Social Sciences, University of Ljubljana, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia.
Lina LiFilm-Television and Communication College, Shanghai Normal University, Shanghai 200234, China.

Funding

National Social Science Foundation of China 17CXW016
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In July 2021, breakthrough cases were reported in the outbreak of COVID-19 in Nanjing, sparking concern and discussion about the vaccine's effectiveness and becoming a trending topic on Sina Weibo. In order to explore public attitudes towards the COVID-19 vaccine and their emotional orientations, we collected 1542 posts under the trending topic through data mining. We set up four categories of attitudes towards COVID-19 vaccines, and used a big data analysis tool to code and manually checked the coding results to complete the content analysis. The results showed that 45.14% of the Weibo posts (

Indexed as

COVID-19Social MediaCOVID-19 VaccinesDisease OutbreaksHumansSARS-CoV-2Vaccination HesitancyVaccine EfficacyCOVID-19 Vaccinesbreakthrough casesCOVID-19 vaccinesentiment orientationsocial media

Identifiers

PMID35010501
PMCPMC8750531

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.