Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35010412›Full record

SynthesisInternational journal of environmental research and public health2021

COVID-19 Prevalence among Healthcare Workers. A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Tafadzwa Dzinamarira, Grant Murewanhema, Malizgani Mhango, Patrick Gad Iradukunda, Itai Chitungo, Moreblessing Mashora, Pelagia Makanda, James Atwine, Munashe Chimene, Elliot Mbunge and 5 more

Abstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 41 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
41citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

41 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Tafadzwa DzinamariraSchool of Health Systems & Public Health, University of Pretoria, Pretoria 0002, South Africa.ORCID 0000-0002-9929-5739
Grant MurewanhemaUnit of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Department of Primary Health Care Sciences, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Zimbabwe, Harare, Zimbabwe.ORCID 0000-0001-7531-730X
Malizgani MhangoSchool of Public Health, University of Western Cape, Cape Town 7535, South Africa.
Patrick Gad IradukundaLondon School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, University of London, London WC1E 7HT, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-0236-7776
Itai ChitungoFaculty of Medicine, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Zimbabwe, Harare, Zimbabwe.ORCID 0000-0001-6306-8916
Moreblessing MashoraDepartment of Public Health, Mount Kenya University, Kigali 00100, Rwanda.
Pelagia MakandaDepartment of Medicine, Jinzhou Medical University, Jinzhou 121001, China.
James AtwineDepartment of Medicine, Jinzhou Medical University, Jinzhou 121001, China.
Munashe ChimeneDepartment of Health Sciences, Africa University, Mutare, Zimbabwe.
Elliot MbungeDepartment of Information Technology, Faculty of Accounting and Informatics, Durban University of Technology, Durban 4000, South Africa.
Munyaradzi Paul MapingureICAP at Columbia University, Harare, Zimbabwe.
Innocent ChingombeICAP at Columbia University, Harare, Zimbabwe.
Godfrey MusukaICAP at Columbia University, Harare, Zimbabwe.ORCID 0000-0001-9077-4429
Sphamandla Josias NkambuleDepartment of Public Health Medicine, School of Nursing and Public Health, University of KwaZulu-Natal, Durban 4001, South Africa.
Bernard NgaraFaculty of Medicine, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Zimbabwe, Harare, Zimbabwe.ORCID 0000-0002-8355-5954

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Understanding the burden of SARS-CoV-2 infections among healthcare workers is a critical component to inform occupational health policy and strategy. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to map and analayse the available global evidence on the prevalence of SARS-CoV-2 infections among healthcare workers. The random-effects adjusted pooled prevalence of COVID-19 among those studies that conducted the test using the antibody (Ab) method was 7% [95% CI: 3 to 17%]. The random-effects adjusted pooled prevalence of COVID-19 among those studies that conducted the test using the PCR method was 11% [95% CI: 7 to 16%]. We found the burden of COVID-19 among healthcare workers to be quite significant and therefore a cause for global health concern. Furthermore, COVID-19 infections among healthcare workers affect service delivery through workers' sick leave, the isolation of confirmed cases and quarantine of contacts, all of which place significant strain on an already shrunken health workforce.

Indexed as

COVID-19Health PersonnelHumansPrevalenceSARS-CoV-2Sick LeaveCOVID-19healthcare workermeta-analysisSARS-CoV-2systematic review

Identifiers

PMID35010412
PMCPMC8750782

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.