Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35010353›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2021

Development and Validation of the Coping Capacity Measurement Scale of Public Health Emergencies in China.

Ao Zhang, Hao Yang, Xiang Wu, Xiaowei Luo, Jingqi Gao

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Ao ZhangSchool of Engineering and Technology, China University of Geosciences, Beijing 100083, China.
Hao YangSchool of Engineering and Technology, China University of Geosciences, Beijing 100083, China.
Xiang WuSchool of Engineering and Technology, China University of Geosciences, Beijing 100083, China.ORCID 0000-0001-6317-8832
Xiaowei LuoDepartment of Architecture and Civil Engineering, City University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong 999077, China.ORCID 0000-0002-9360-7308
Jingqi GaoSchool of Engineering and Technology, China University of Geosciences, Beijing 100083, China.ORCID 0000-0003-4239-4004

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Public health emergency coping capacity has been an important direction in crisis research in recent years. The use of the public health emergency coping capacity scale to evaluate the public's response and feelings regarding public health emergencies is one of the essential ways to improve the effectiveness of public health emergency response. Based on literature research, this paper constructed the theoretical dimension of public health emergency coping ability and completed the development of the items of the initial scale in China. After using SPSS 22.0-conducted exploratory factor analysis, confirmatory factor analysis, and reliability test, the scale dimensions and items were deleted and optimized. The final public health emergency coping capacity measurement scale in China included 12 items and four dimensions. The results showed that the developed scale has high reliability and validity, which is helpful for the relevant personnel to understand the level of public health emergency coping ability and provides an essential basis for timely and accurate emergency prevention and control interventions.

Indexed as

EmergenciesPublic HealthAdaptation, PsychologicalChinaHumansReproducibility of ResultsSurveys and Questionnairescoping abilitypublic health emergenciesscale development

Identifiers

PMID35010353
PMCPMC8751145

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.