Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35010349›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2021

Predictors and Assessment of Hospice Use for End-Stage Renal Disease Patients in Taiwan.

Hung-Cheng Chen, Chien-Yi Wu, Hui-Ya Hsieh, Jiun-Shiuan He, Shang-Jyh Hwang, Hui-Min Hsieh

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. When Patients Make Unexpected Medical Choices.Federal practitioner : for the health care professionals of the VA, DoD, and PHS · 2023
    Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Hung-Cheng ChenDepartment of Nursing, Kaohsiung Medical University Hospital, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung 80708, Taiwan.ORCID 0000-0001-7912-0977
Chien-Yi WuDepartment of Family Medicine, Kaohsiung Medical University Hospital, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung 80708, Taiwan.ORCID 0000-0002-0671-3947
Hui-Ya HsiehDepartment of Nursing, Kaohsiung Medical University Hospital, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung 80708, Taiwan.
Jiun-Shiuan HeDepartment of Medical Research, Kaohsiung Medical University Hospital, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung 80708, Taiwan.
Shang-Jyh HwangDivision of Nephrology, Department of Internal Medicine, Kaohsiung Medical University Hospital, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung 80708, Taiwan.
Hui-Min HsiehDepartment of Medical Research, Kaohsiung Medical University Hospital, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung 80708, Taiwan.ORCID 0000-0003-3286-7306

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesHospice and early palliative care are generally considered as an alternative and supportive care to offer symptoms relief and optimize the quality of life among end-stage renal disease (ESRD) patients, but hospice care remains underutilized. This study aimed to examine patient and health system characteristics and develop a patient assessment scale to evaluate ESRD patients for hospice care after the implementation of non-cancer hospice care reimbursement policy in 2009 in Taiwan.

methodWe conducted a retrospective cohort study using nationwide population-based datasets. Adult long-term dialysis patients between 2009 and 2012 were included. Multivariable logistic regression and the Firth penalized likelihood estimation were used to estimate the likelihood of receiving hospice care. A receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC) analysis and C-statistic were calculated to determine the optimal models for a patient assessment of hospice use.

resultsPatients who were older, comorbid with anemia (odds ratio [OR] 3.53, 95% CI 1.43-8.70) or sepsis (OR 1.62, 95% CI 1.08-2.44), with longer dialysis durations, more hospitalizations (OR 4.68, 95% CI 2.56-8.55), or primary provider care with hospice (OR 5.15, 95% CI 2.80-9.45) were more likely to receive hospice care. The total score of the patient assessment scale of hospice care was 0-28 with a cut-off value of 19 based on the results of the receiver operating characteristic curve.

conclusionGiven the "Patient Right to Autonomy Act" implemented in Taiwan in 2019 to promote the concept of a "good quality of death", this patient assessment scale may help health professionals target ESRD patients for hospice care and engage in shared decision making and the advance care planning process.

Indexed as

Hospice CareHospicesKidney Failure, ChronicHumansQuality of LifeRetrospective StudiesTaiwanadvance care planningend-stage renal diseasehospice carepalliative carePatient Right to Autonomy Act

Identifiers

PMID35010349
PMCPMC8751193

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.