Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35010333›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2021

Ethnic Composition of Couples and Mutual Health Benefit Receipt: Register-Based Evidence from Finland.

Jan Saarela, Maria Stanfors, Mikael Rostila

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Jan SaarelaDemography Unit, Strandgatan 2, Åbo Akademi University, 65100 Vasa, Finland.ORCID 0000-0001-8313-4271
Maria StanforsDepartment of Economic History, Lund University, 22007 Lund, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0002-5007-4257
Mikael RostilaDepartment of Public Health Sciences, Stockholm University, 10691 Stockholm, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0002-6973-0381

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The literature on health dependencies among partners typically ignores diversity of partnership characteristics. One salient example is the ethnic composition. We extend prior work on partnerships and health by investigating how married and cohabiting partners mutually influence each other's receipt of health-related benefits, focusing on how such correlations vary with the couple's ethnic composition. We study partners' mutual receipt of sickness allowance and disability pension in ethnically endogamous and exogamous couples in Finland. The population consists of native individuals in similar socioeconomic positions but belonging to two different ethnic groups-Finnish and Swedish speakers-who differ in health and family life. Using data from population registers, we estimate discrete-time hazard models for first-time benefit receipt, as related to partner's benefit receipt, among midlife couples. We found evidence of mutual receipt of health benefits in both endogamous and exogamous couples, the correlation being strongest for disability pension. Partner correlation in disability pension receipt is slightly stronger in endogamous Swedish than in endogamous Finnish couples, while women in exogamous couples are slightly less sensitive to men's receipt than vice versa. The results show that mutual health may be heterogeneous across couples that differ in ethnic composition.

Indexed as

EthnicityMenFemaleFinlandHumansMaleMarriagePensionscouplesethnicityhealth benefit receiptintermarriage

Identifiers

PMID35010333
PMCPMC8751056

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.