Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35010289›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2021

From Syndemic Lesson after COVID-19 Pandemic to a "Systemic Clinical Risk Management" Proposal in the Perspective of the Ethics of Job Well Done.

Francesco De Micco, Anna De Benedictis, Vittorio Fineschi, Paola Frati, Massimo Ciccozzi, Leandro Pecchia, Rossana Alloni, Nicola Petrosillo, Simonetta Filippi, Giampaolo Ghilardi and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Digital Health Care, Telemedicine, and Medicolegal Issues in Orthopedics: A Review.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Francesco De MiccoBioethics and Humanities Research Unit, Campus Bio-Medico University of Rome, 00128 Rome, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-8483-3787
Anna De BenedictisBioethics and Humanities Research Unit, Campus Bio-Medico University of Rome, 00128 Rome, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-8655-0895
Vittorio FineschiDepartment of Anatomical, Histological, Forensic and Orthopaedic Sciences (SAIMLAL), Sapienza University of Rome, 00185 Rome, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-1686-3236
Paola FratiDepartment of Anatomical, Histological, Forensic and Orthopaedic Sciences (SAIMLAL), Sapienza University of Rome, 00185 Rome, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-0358-7965
Massimo CiccozziMedical Statistics and Molecular Epidemiology Research Unit, Campus Bio-Medico University of Rome, 00128 Rome, Italy.
Leandro PecchiaApplied Biomedical Signal Processing and Intelligent eHealth Lab, University of Warwick (UK), Warwick CV4 7AL, UK.
Rossana AlloniBioethics and Humanities Research Unit, Campus Bio-Medico University of Rome, 00128 Rome, Italy.
Nicola PetrosilloCampus Bio-Medico University Hospital, 00128 Rome, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-2585-7567
Simonetta FilippiNon Linear Physics and Mathematical Models Research Unit, Campus Bio-Medico University of Rome, 00128 Rome, Italy.
Giampaolo GhilardiBioethics and Humanities Research Unit, Campus Bio-Medico University of Rome, 00128 Rome, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-4815-8563
Laura Leondina CampanozziBioethics and Humanities Research Unit, Campus Bio-Medico University of Rome, 00128 Rome, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-4458-5165
Vittoradolfo TamboneBioethics and Humanities Research Unit, Campus Bio-Medico University of Rome, 00128 Rome, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-9231-9523

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The syndemic framework proposed by the 2021-2030 World Health Organization (WHO) action plan for patient safety and the introduction of enabling technologies in health services involve a more effective interpretation of the data to understand causation. Based on the Systemic Theory, this communication proposes the "Systemic Clinical Risk Management" (SCRM) to improve the Quality of Care and Patient Safety. This is a new Clinical Risk Management model capable of developing the ability to observe and synthesize different elements in ways that lead to in-depth interventions to achieve solutions aligned with the sustainable development of health services. In order to avoid uncontrolled decision-making related to the use of enabling technologies, we devised an internal Learning Algorithm Risk Management (LARM) level based on a Bayesian approach. Moreover, according to the ethics of Job Well Done, the SCRM, instead of giving an opinion on events that have already occurred, proposes a bioethical co-working because it suggests the best way to act from a scientific point of view.

Indexed as

COVID-19Bayes TheoremHumansPandemicsRisk ManagementSARS-CoV-2SyndemicBayesian networkbig dataclinical risk managementenabling technologiesmedical ethicspatient safetyquality of caresupport for policy makingsustainability

Identifiers

PMID35010289
PMCPMC8750949

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.