Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35010080›Full record

ReviewNanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland)2021

A Review of Microbial Mediated Iron Nanoparticles (IONPs) and Its Biomedical Applications.

Muhammad Nadeem, Rijma Khan, Nausheen Shah, Ishrat Rehman Bangash, Bilal Haider Abbasi, Christophe Hano, Chunzhao Liu, Sana Ullah, Syed Salman Hashmi, Akhtar Nadhman and 1 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Nanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Curcumin-coated iron oxide nanoparticles for photodynamic therapy of breast cancer.Photochemical & photobiological sciences : Official journal of the European Photochemistry Association and the European Society for Photobiology · 2025
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Green-synthesized α-FeBMC microbiology · 2024
    Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Muhammad NadeemDepartment of Biotechnology, Institute of Integrative Biosciences, CECOS University, Peshawar 25100, Pakistan.
Rijma KhanDepartment of Biotechnology, Institute of Integrative Biosciences, CECOS University, Peshawar 25100, Pakistan.ORCID 0000-0002-9408-7551
Nausheen ShahDepartment of Biotechnology, Institute of Integrative Biosciences, CECOS University, Peshawar 25100, Pakistan.
Ishrat Rehman BangashDepartment of Biotechnology, Institute of Integrative Biosciences, CECOS University, Peshawar 25100, Pakistan.
Bilal Haider AbbasiDepartment of Biotechnology, Quaid-i-Azam University, Islamabad 45320, Pakistan.ORCID 0000-0002-6529-2134
Christophe HanoLaboratoire de Biologie des Ligneux et des Grandes Cultures (LBLGC), Plant Lignans Team, INRAE USC1328, Eure Et Loir Campus, Université d'Orléans, F28000 Chartres, France.ORCID 0000-0001-9938-0151
Chunzhao LiuState Key Laboratory of Bio-fibers, Eco-textiles Institute of Biochemical Engineering, College of Materials Science and Engineering, Qingdao University, Qingdao 266071, China.
Sana UllahDepartment of Biotechnology, Quaid-i-Azam University, Islamabad 45320, Pakistan.ORCID 0000-0001-7584-0563
Syed Salman HashmiDepartment of Biotechnology, Quaid-i-Azam University, Islamabad 45320, Pakistan.
Akhtar NadhmanDepartment of Biotechnology, Institute of Integrative Biosciences, CECOS University, Peshawar 25100, Pakistan.
Jonathan CelliDepartment of Physics, University of Massachusetts, Boston, MA 02125, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-3560-0770

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Nanotechnology is a booming avenue in science and has a multitude of applications in health, agriculture, and industry. It exploits materials' size at nanoscale (1-100 nm) known as nanoparticles (NPs). These nanoscale constituents are made via chemical, physical, and biological methods; however, the biological approach offers multiple benefits over the other counterparts. This method utilizes various biological resources for synthesis (microbes, plants, and others), which act as a reducing and capping agent. Among these sources, microbes provide an excellent platform for synthesis and have been recently exploited in the synthesis of various metallic NPs, in particular iron. Owing to their biocompatible nature, superparamagnetic properties, small size efficient, permeability, and absorption, they have become an integral part of biomedical research. This review focuses on microbial synthesis of iron oxide nanoparticles using various species of bacteria, fungi, and yeast. Possible applications and challenges that need to be addressed have also been discussed in the review; in particular, their antimicrobial and anticancer potentials are discussed in detail along with possible mechanisms. Moreover, some other possible biomedical applications are also highlighted. Although iron oxide nanoparticles have revolutionized biomedical research, issues such as cytotoxicity and biodegradability are still a major bottleneck in the commercialization of these nanoparticle-based products. Addressing these issues should be the topmost priority so that the biomedical industry can reap maximum benefit from iron oxide nanoparticle-based products.

Indexed as

anticancerantimicrobialgreen synthesisiron oxidenanoparticles

Identifiers

PMID35010080
PMCPMC8746504

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.