ArticleNanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland)2021
Electrospray Deposition of Cellulose Nanofibers on Paper: Overcoming the Limitations of Conventional Coating.
Article in Nanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Stabilization of Beeswax-In-Water Dispersions Using Anionic Cellulose Nanofibers and Their Application in Paper Coating.Nanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Synergies between Fibrillated Nanocellulose and Hot-Pressing of Papers Obtained from High-Yield Pulp.Nanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Preparation, Characterization and Industrial Application of Nanocellulose.Nanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Article
- Dynamic Light Scattering Plus Scanning Electron Microscopy: Usefulness and Limitations of a Simplified Estimation of Nanocellulose Dimensions.Nanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Cellulose Nanofibers/Pectin/Pomegranate Extract Nanocomposite as Antibacterial and Antioxidant Films and Coating for Paper.Polymers · 2022Article
- Improving the Barrier Properties of Paper to Moisture, Air, and Grease with Nanocellulose-Based Coating Suspensions.Nanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Micro- and Nanofibrillated Cellulose from Annual Plant-Sourced Fibers: Comparison between Enzymatic Hydrolysis and Mechanical Refining.Nanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
While the potential of cellulose nanofibers to enhance the mechanical and barrier properties of paper is well-known, there are many uncertainties with respect to how to apply them. In this study, we use not only bulk addition of micro-/nanofibers and bar coating with oxidized nanofibers, but also a combination of these and, as a novel element, electrospray deposition of nanofiber dispersions. Characterization involved testing the strength of uncoated and coated paper sheets, their resistance to air flow, their Bendtsen roughness, and their apparent density, plus visualization of their surface and cross-sections by scanning electron microscopy. As expected, bulk addition to the unrefined pulp was sufficient to attain substantial strengthening, but this enhancement was limited to approximately 124%. Following this, surface addition by bar coating improved air resistance, but not strength, since, as applying nanocellulose at high consistency was technically unfeasible, this was performed several times with detrimental drying stages in between. However, replacing bar coating with electrospraying helped us overcome these apparent limitations, producing enhancements in both barrier and tensile properties. It is concluded that electrosprayed nanofibers, owing to their uniform deposition and favorable interactions, operate as an effective binder between fibers (and/or fines).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.