Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35009754›Full record

ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2021

Robotic Replica of a Human Spine Uses Soft Magnetic Sensor Array to Forecast Intervertebral Loads and Posture after Surgery.

Maohua Lin, Moaed A Abd, Alex Taing, Chi-Tay Tsai, Frank D Vrionis, Erik D Engeberg

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 36% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Artificial intelligence and machine learning based predictive analytics in cervical myelopathy - a scoping review.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2026
    Article
  2. The Frontiers of Smart Healthcare Systems.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Maohua LinDepartment of Ocean and Mechanical Engineering, Florida Atlantic University, Boca Raton, FL 33431, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-9460-2111
Moaed A AbdDepartment of Ocean and Mechanical Engineering, Florida Atlantic University, Boca Raton, FL 33431, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-8495-4244
Alex TaingDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA 22904, USA.
Chi-Tay TsaiDepartment of Ocean and Mechanical Engineering, Florida Atlantic University, Boca Raton, FL 33431, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-8452-5119
Frank D VrionisDepartment of Neurosurgery, Marcus Neuroscience Institute, Boca Raton Regional Hospital, Boca Raton, FL 33486, USA.
Erik D EngebergDepartment of Ocean and Mechanical Engineering, Florida Atlantic University, Boca Raton, FL 33431, USA.
Florida Atlantic University · USBoca Raton Regional Hospital · USUniversity of Virginia · US

Funding

SCH: INT: Virtual Neuroprosthesis: Restoring Autonomy to People Suffering From NeurotraumaR01EB025819 · NIBIB · FLORIDA ATLANTIC UNIVERSITY · PI DU, E, ENGEBERG, ERIK · 2017 to 2020
$1.8M
NIBIB NIH HHS R01 EB025819NIH HHS R01EB025819
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cervical disc implants are conventional surgical treatments for patients with degenerative disc disease, such as cervical myelopathy and radiculopathy. However, the surgeon still must determine the candidacy of cervical disc implants mainly from the findings of diagnostic imaging studies, which can sometimes lead to complications and implant failure. To help address these problems, a new approach was developed to enable surgeons to preview the post-operative effects of an artificial disc implant in a patient-specific fashion prior to surgery. To that end, a robotic replica of a person's spine was 3D printed, modified to include an artificial disc implant, and outfitted with a soft magnetic sensor array. The aims of this study are threefold: first, to evaluate the potential of a soft magnetic sensor array to detect the location and amplitude of applied loads; second, to use the soft magnetic sensor array in a 3D printed human spine replica to distinguish between five different robotically actuated postures; and third, to compare the efficacy of four different machine learning algorithms to classify the loads, amplitudes, and postures obtained from the first and second aims. Benchtop experiments showed that the soft magnetic sensor array was capable of precisely detecting the location and amplitude of forces, which were successfully classified by four different machine learning algorithms that were compared for their capabilities: Support Vector Machine (SVM), K-Nearest Neighbor (KNN), Random Forest (RF), and Artificial Neural Network (ANN). In particular, the RF and ANN algorithms were able to classify locations of loads applied 3.25 mm apart with 98.39% ± 1.50% and 98.05% ± 1.56% accuracies, respectively. Furthermore, the ANN had an accuracy of 94.46% ± 2.84% to classify the location that a 10 g load was applied. The artificial disc-implanted spine replica was subjected to flexion and extension by a robotic arm. Five different postures of the spine were successfully classified with 100% ± 0.0% accuracy with the ANN using the soft magnetic sensor array. All results indicated that the magnetic sensor array has promising potential to generate data prior to invasive surgeries that could be utilized to preoperatively assess the suitability of a particular intervention for specific patients and to potentially assist the postoperative care of people with cervical disc implants.

Indexed as

Intervertebral DiscRobotic Surgical ProceduresCervical VertebraeHumansMagnetic PhenomenaPostureRange of Motion, Articular3D printingartificial disccervical spinemachine learningsensor arraysoft magnet

Identifiers

PMID35009754
PMCPMC8749580
OpenAlexW4200346261

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.