Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35009749›Full record

ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2021

Generative Adversarial Networks for Morphological-Temporal Classification of Stem Cell Images.

Adam Witmer, Bir Bhanu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Adam WitmerVisualization and Intelligent Systems Laboratory, University of California, Riverside, CA 92521, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-1097-651X
Bir BhanuVisualization and Intelligent Systems Laboratory, University of California, Riverside, CA 92521, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-8971-6416

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Frequently, neural network training involving biological images suffers from a lack of data, resulting in inefficient network learning. This issue stems from limitations in terms of time, resources, and difficulty in cellular experimentation and data collection. For example, when performing experimental analysis, it may be necessary for the researcher to use most of their data for testing, as opposed to model training. Therefore, the goal of this paper is to perform dataset augmentation using generative adversarial networks (GAN) to increase the classification accuracy of deep convolutional neural networks (CNN) trained on induced pluripotent stem cell microscopy images. The main challenges are: 1. modeling complex data using GAN and 2. training neural networks on augmented datasets that contain generated data. To address these challenges, a temporally constrained, hierarchical classification scheme that exploits domain knowledge is employed for model learning. First, image patches of cell colonies from gray-scale microscopy images are generated using GAN, and then these images are added to the real dataset and used to address class imbalances at multiple stages of training. Overall, a 2% increase in both true positive rate and F1-score is observed using this method as compared to a straightforward, imbalanced classification network, with some greater improvements on a classwise basis. This work demonstrates that synergistic model design involving domain knowledge is key for biological image analysis and improves model learning in high-throughput scenarios.

Indexed as

Image Processing, Computer-AssistedNeural Networks, ComputerStem Cellsdataset augmentationdeep learningdevelopmental toxicologygenerative adversarial networksstem cell biology

Identifiers

PMID35009749
PMCPMC8749838

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.