ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2021
Visual Perceptual Quality Assessment Based on Blind Machine Learning Techniques.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- The Image Definition Assessment of Optoelectronic Tracking Equipment Based on the BRISQUE Algorithm with Gaussian Weights.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Image Sensing and Processing with Convolutional Neural Networks.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This paper presents the construction of a new objective method for estimation of visual perceiving quality. The proposal provides an assessment of image quality without the need for a reference image or a specific distortion assumption. Two main processes have been used to build our models: The first one uses deep learning with a convolutional neural network process, without any preprocessing. The second objective visual quality is computed by pooling several image features extracted from different concepts: the natural scene statistic in the spatial domain, the gradient magnitude, the Laplacian of Gaussian, as well as the spectral and spatial entropies. The features extracted from the image file are used as the input of machine learning techniques to build the models that are used to estimate the visual quality level of any image. For the machine learning training phase, two main processes are proposed: The first proposed process consists of a direct learning using all the selected features in only one training phase, named direct learning blind visual quality assessment DLBQA. The second process is an indirect learning and consists of two training phases, named indirect learning blind visual quality assessment ILBQA. This second process includes an additional phase of construction of intermediary metrics used for the construction of the prediction model. The produced models are evaluated on many benchmarks image databases as TID2013, LIVE, and LIVE in the wild image quality challenge. The experimental results demonstrate that the proposed models produce the best visual perception quality prediction, compared to the state-of-the-art models. The proposed models have been implemented on an FPGA platform to demonstrate the feasibility of integrating the proposed solution on an image sensor.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.