Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35009586›Full record

ReviewSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2021

Pros and Cons of CAD/CAM Technology for Infection Prevention in Dental Settings during COVID-19 Outbreak.

Livia Barenghi, Alberto Barenghi, Umberto Garagiola, Alberto Di Blasio, Aldo Bruno Giannì, Francesco Spadari

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. The Accuracy of 3D-Printed Fixed Dental Restorations.Journal of esthetic and restorative dentistry : official publication of the American Academy of Esthetic Dentistry ... [et al.] · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. COVID-19 in Dental Practice Is Prevented by Eugenol Responsible for the Ambient Odor Specific to Dental Offices: Possibility and Speculation.Medical principles and practice : international journal of the Kuwait University, Health Science Centre · 2024
    Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Alginate-Based Bio-Composites and Their Potential Applications.Journal of functional biomaterials · 2022
    Review
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Livia BarenghiDepartment of Biomedical, Surgical and Dental Sciences, University of Milano, 20122 Milan, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-7493-5798
Alberto BarenghiDepartment of Medicine and Surgery, Centro di Odontoiatria, Parma University, 43126 Parma, Italy.
Umberto GaragiolaDepartment of Biomedical, Surgical and Dental Sciences, University of Milano, 20122 Milan, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-3256-6725
Alberto Di BlasioDepartment of Medicine and Surgery, Centro di Odontoiatria, Parma University, 43126 Parma, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-0219-6946
Aldo Bruno GiannìDepartment of Biomedical, Surgical and Dental Sciences, University of Milano, 20122 Milan, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-5983-9674
Francesco SpadariDepartment of Biomedical, Surgical and Dental Sciences, University of Milano, 20122 Milan, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The purpose of this commentary is to update the evidence reported in our previous review on the advantages and limitations of computer-aided design/computer-aided manufacturing technology in the promotion of dental business, as well as to guarantee patient and occupational safety. The COVID-19 pandemic led to an unprecedented focus on infection prevention; however, waves of COVID-19 follow one another, asymptomatic cases are nearly impossible to identify by triage in a dental setting, and the effectiveness of long-lasting immune protection through vaccination remains largely unknown. Different national laws and international guidelines (mainly USA-CDC, ECDC) have often brought about dissimilar awareness and operational choices, and in general, there has been very limited attention to this technology. Here, we discuss its advantages and limitations in light of: (a) presence of SARS-CoV-2 in the oral cavity, saliva, and dental biofilm and activation of dormant microbial infections; (b) the prevention of SARS-CoV-2 transmission by aerosol and fomite contamination; (c) the detection of various oral manifestations of COVID-19; (d) specific information for the reprocessing of the scanner tip and the ward from the manufacturers.

Indexed as

COVID-19Computer-Aided DesignDisease OutbreaksHumansPandemicsSARS-CoV-2TechnologyaerosolCOVID-19dentistrydigital technologyfomiteguidelinesintraoral scanningreconditioningsafetySARS-CoV-2

Identifiers

PMID35009586
PMCPMC8747329

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.