Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35008965›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of molecular sciences2022

3D Bioprinting of Gelatin-Xanthan Gum Composite Hydrogels for Growth of Human Skin Cells.

Beatrice Piola, Maurizio Sabbatini, Sarah Gino, Marco Invernizzi, Filippo Renò

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of molecular sciences, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 26 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Trends in the Treatment of Chronic Wounds.Current medicinal chemistry · 2025
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Production of Bacterial Exopolysaccharides: Xanthan and Bacterial Cellulose.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Beatrice PiolaInnovative Research Laboratory for Wound Healing, Health Sciences Department, Medical School, Università del Piemonte Orientale, Via Solaroli 17, 28100 Novara, Italy.
Maurizio SabbatiniDepartment of Sciences and Technological Innovation, Università del Piemonte Orientale, Via T. Michel 11, 15121 Alessandria, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-5263-3980
Sarah GinoInnovative Research Laboratory for Wound Healing, Health Sciences Department, Medical School, Università del Piemonte Orientale, Via Solaroli 17, 28100 Novara, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-9415-4788
Marco InvernizziHealth Science Department, Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Division, Università del Piemonte Orientale, Via Solaroli 17, 28100 Novara, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-5141-0681
Filippo RenòInnovative Research Laboratory for Wound Healing, Health Sciences Department, Medical School, Università del Piemonte Orientale, Via Solaroli 17, 28100 Novara, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-2410-4966

Funding

Università del Piemonte Orientale, Dept. Health Sciences RIVinvernizzimRL16_BCRLrehab17_19
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In recent years, bioprinting has attracted much attention as a potential tool for generating complex 3D biological constructs capable of mimicking the native tissue microenvironment and promoting physiologically relevant cell-cell and cell-matrix interactions. The aim of the present study was to develop a crosslinked 3D printable hydrogel based on biocompatible natural polymers, gelatin and xanthan gum at different percentages to be used both as a scaffold for cell growth and as a wound dressing. The CellInk Inkredible 3D printer was used for the 3D printing of hydrogels, and a glutaraldehyde solution was tested for the crosslinking process. We were able to obtain two kinds of printable hydrogels with different porosity, swelling and degradation time. Subsequently, the printed hydrogels were characterized from the point of view of biocompatibility. Our results showed that gelatin/xanthan-gum bioprinted hydrogels were biocompatible materials, as they allowed both human keratinocyte and fibroblast in vitro growth for 14 days. These two bioprintable hydrogels could be also used as a helpful dressing material.

Indexed as

BioprintingCell Culture TechniquesGelatinHydrogelsPolysaccharides, BacterialPrinting, Three-DimensionalBiocompatible MaterialsCells, CulturedChemical PhenomenaHumansKeratinocytesPorositySkinTissue EngineeringTissue ScaffoldsBiocompatible MaterialsGelatinHydrogelsPolysaccharides, Bacterialxanthan gumbiocompatibilitybioprintinggelatinhydrogelxanthan gum

Identifiers

PMID35008965
PMCPMC8745252

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.