Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35008876›Full record

ReviewInternational journal of molecular sciences2021

Microvascular Experimentation in the Chick Chorioallantoic Membrane as a Model for Screening Angiogenic Agents including from Gene-Modified Cells.

Donna C Kennedy, Barbara Coen, Antony M Wheatley, Karl J A McCullagh

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in International journal of molecular sciences, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Assessment of Angiogenic Properties of Malignant Pleural Effusion (MPE) Fluid.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2025
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Anti-angiogenic Potential of Trans-chalcone in anCardiovascular & hematological agents in medicinal chemistry · 2024
    Article
  17. Cutaneous Polymeric-Micelles-Based Hydrogel ContainingPharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Article
  18. Article
  19. The Effects of Abscisic Acid on Angiogenesis in Both ex vivo and in vivo Assays.Asian Pacific journal of cancer prevention : APJCP · 2022
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Donna C KennedyDepartment of Physiology, School of Medicine, Human Biology Building, National University of Ireland, H91 W5P7 Galway, Ireland.ORCID 0000-0002-9027-7876
Barbara CoenDepartment of Physiology, School of Medicine, Human Biology Building, National University of Ireland, H91 W5P7 Galway, Ireland.
Antony M WheatleyDepartment of Physiology, School of Medicine, Human Biology Building, National University of Ireland, H91 W5P7 Galway, Ireland.ORCID 0000-0002-1068-929X
Karl J A McCullaghDepartment of Physiology, School of Medicine, Human Biology Building, National University of Ireland, H91 W5P7 Galway, Ireland.ORCID 0000-0002-0756-2845

Funding

Irish Research Council GOIPG/2018/2622
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The chick chorioallantoic membrane (CAM) assay model of angiogenesis has been highlighted as a relatively quick, low cost and effective model for the study of pro-angiogenic and anti-angiogenic factors. The chick CAM is a highly vascularised extraembryonic membrane which functions for gas exchange, nutrient exchange and waste removal for the growing chick embryo. It is beneficial as it can function as a treatment screening tool, which bridges the gap between cell based in vitro studies and in vivo animal experimentation. In this review, we explore the benefits and drawbacks of the CAM assay to study microcirculation, by the investigation of each distinct stage of the CAM assay procedure, including cultivation techniques, treatment applications and methods of determining an angiogenic response using this assay. We detail the angiogenic effect of treatments, including drugs, metabolites, genes and cells used in conjunction with the CAM assay, while also highlighting the testing of genetically modified cells. We also present a detailed exploration of the advantages and limitations of different CAM analysis techniques, including visual assessment, histological and molecular analysis along with vascular casting methods and live blood flow observations.

Indexed as

Neovascularization, PathologicNeovascularization, PhysiologicAngiogenesis Inducing AgentsAnimalsChick EmbryoChorioallantoic MembraneAngiogenesis Inducing Agentsangiogenesisblood flowcancerchorioallantoic membrane (CAM)microcirculationtumour

Identifiers

PMID35008876
PMCPMC8745510

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.