Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35008745›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of molecular sciences2021

Classification of Amyloidosis by Model-Assisted Mass Spectrometry-Based Proteomics.

Nicolai Bjødstrup Palstrøm, Aleksandra M Rojek, Hanne E H Møller, Charlotte Toftmann Hansen, Rune Matthiesen, Lars Melholt Rasmussen, Niels Abildgaard, Hans Christian Beck

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of molecular sciences, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Diagnostic Challenges and Solutions in Systemic Amyloidosis.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Nicolai Bjødstrup PalstrømOdense Amyloidosis Center, Odense University Hospital, 5000 Odense, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0003-1480-6550
Aleksandra M RojekOdense Amyloidosis Center, Odense University Hospital, 5000 Odense, Denmark.
Hanne E H MøllerOdense Amyloidosis Center, Odense University Hospital, 5000 Odense, Denmark.
Charlotte Toftmann HansenOdense Amyloidosis Center, Odense University Hospital, 5000 Odense, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0003-1080-6609
Rune MatthiesenComputational and Experimental Biology Group, CEDOC, Chronic Diseases Research Centre, NOVA Medical School, Faculdade de Ciências Médicas, Universidade NOVA de Lisboa, 1169-056 Lisbon, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0002-6353-2616
Lars Melholt RasmussenOdense Amyloidosis Center, Odense University Hospital, 5000 Odense, Denmark.
Niels AbildgaardOdense Amyloidosis Center, Odense University Hospital, 5000 Odense, Denmark.
Hans Christian BeckOdense Amyloidosis Center, Odense University Hospital, 5000 Odense, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0002-7763-3637
Odense University Hospital · DKUniversidade Nova de Lisboa · PT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Amyloidosis is a rare disease caused by the misfolding and extracellular aggregation of proteins as insoluble fibrillary deposits localized either in specific organs or systemically throughout the body. The organ targeted and the disease progression and outcome is highly dependent on the specific fibril-forming protein, and its accurate identification is essential to the choice of treatment. Mass spectrometry-based proteomics has become the method of choice for the identification of the amyloidogenic protein. Regrettably, this identification relies on manual and subjective interpretation of mass spectrometry data by an expert, which is undesirable and may bias diagnosis. To circumvent this, we developed a statistical model-assisted method for the unbiased identification of amyloid-containing biopsies and amyloidosis subtyping. Based on data from mass spectrometric analysis of amyloid-containing biopsies and corresponding controls. A Boruta method applied on a random forest classifier was applied to proteomics data obtained from the mass spectrometric analysis of 75 laser dissected Congo Red positive amyloid-containing biopsies and 78 Congo Red negative biopsies to identify novel "amyloid signature" proteins that included clusterin, fibulin-1, vitronectin complement component C9 and also three collagen proteins, as well as the well-known amyloid signature proteins apolipoprotein E, apolipoprotein A4, and serum amyloid P. A SVM learning algorithm were trained on the mass spectrometry data from the analysis of the 75 amyloid-containing biopsies and 78 amyloid-negative control biopsies. The trained algorithm performed superior in the discrimination of amyloid-containing biopsies from controls, with an accuracy of 1.0 when applied to a blinded mass spectrometry validation data set of 103 prospectively collected amyloid-containing biopsies. Moreover, our method successfully classified amyloidosis patients according to the subtype in 102 out of 103 blinded cases. Collectively, our model-assisted approach identified novel amyloid-associated proteins and demonstrated the use of mass spectrometry-based data in clinical diagnostics of disease by the unbiased and reliable model-assisted classification of amyloid deposits and of the specific amyloid subtype.

Indexed as

Mass SpectrometryModels, BiologicalProteomicsAmyloidAmyloidosisHumansReproducibility of ResultsSupport Vector MachineAmyloidamyloidosislaser microdissectionmachine learningmass spectrometryproteomics

Identifiers

PMID35008745
PMCPMC8745254
OpenAlexW4200334900

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.