Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35008735›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of molecular sciences2021

Physical Considerations for In Vitro ESWT Research Design.

Cyrill Slezak, Roland Rose, Julia M Jilge, Robert Nuster, David Hercher, Paul Slezak

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of molecular sciences, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 49% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Shockwaves Increase In Vitro Resilience ofInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Cyrill SlezakDepartment of Physics, Utah Valley University, Orem, UT 84059, USA.
Roland RoseLudwig Boltzmann Institute for Experimental and Clinical Traumatology, AUVA Research Center, 1200 Vienna, Austria.
Julia M JilgeLudwig Boltzmann Institute for Experimental and Clinical Traumatology, AUVA Research Center, 1200 Vienna, Austria.
Robert NusterDepartment of Physics, University of Graz, 8010 Graz, Austria.ORCID 0000-0001-6446-8057
David HercherLudwig Boltzmann Institute for Experimental and Clinical Traumatology, AUVA Research Center, 1200 Vienna, Austria.ORCID 0000-0001-5928-9492
Paul SlezakLudwig Boltzmann Institute for Experimental and Clinical Traumatology, AUVA Research Center, 1200 Vienna, Austria.
Ludwig Boltzmann Institute for Traumatology, The Research Center in Cooperation with AUVA · ATUniversity of Applied Sciences Technikum Wien · ATUniversity of Graz · ATUniversity of Veterinary Medicine Vienna · ATUtah Valley University · US

Funding

Austrian Science Fund FWF P 28032
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In vitro investigations, which comprise the bulk of research efforts geared at identifying an underlying biomechanical mechanism for extracorporeal shock wave therapy (ESWT), are commonly hampered by inadequate descriptions of the underlying therapeutic acoustical pressure waves. We demonstrate the necessity of in-situ sound pressure measurements inside the treated samples considering the significant differences associated with available applicator technologies and cell containment. A statistical analysis of pulse-to-pulse variability in an electrohydraulic applicator yields a recommendation for a minimal pulse number of

Indexed as

Extracorporeal Shockwave TherapyResearch DesignAdipose TissueHumansPressureStromal Cellsin vitroregenerative medicinesedimentationshockwave therapy

Identifiers

PMID35008735
PMCPMC8745079
OpenAlexW4200562981

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.