Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35008719›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of molecular sciences2021

Implantation of Various Cell-Free Matrixes Does Not Contribute to the Restoration of Hyaline Cartilage within Full-Thickness Focal Defects.

Shabnam I Ibragimova, Ekaterina V Medvedeva, Irina A Romanova, Leonid P Istranov, Elena V Istranova, Aleksey V Lychagin, Andrey A Nedorubov, Peter S Timashev, Vladimir I Telpukhov, Andrei S Chagin

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of molecular sciences, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Cartilage · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.

Shabnam I IbragimovaInstitute of Regenerative Medicine, I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University (Sechenov University), 119991 Moscow, Russia.
Ekaterina V MedvedevaInstitute of Regenerative Medicine, I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University (Sechenov University), 119991 Moscow, Russia.
Irina A RomanovaWorld-Class Research Center, Digital Biodesign and Personalized Healthcare, Sechenov University, 8-2 Trubetskaya St., 119991 Moscow, Russia.
Leonid P IstranovInstitute of Regenerative Medicine, I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University (Sechenov University), 119991 Moscow, Russia.
Elena V IstranovaInstitute of Regenerative Medicine, I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University (Sechenov University), 119991 Moscow, Russia.
Aleksey V LychaginDepartment of Traumatology, Orthopedics and Disaster Surgery, Sechenov University, 8-2 Trubetskaya St., 119991 Moscow, Russia.ORCID 0000-0002-2202-8149
Andrey A NedorubovCenter for Preclinical Research, Institute of Translational Medicine and Biotechnology, I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University, 119991 Moscow, Russia.
Peter S TimashevInstitute of Regenerative Medicine, I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University (Sechenov University), 119991 Moscow, Russia.ORCID 0000-0001-7773-2435
Vladimir I TelpukhovDepartment of Operative Surgery and Topographic Anatomy, I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University (Sechenov University), 119991 Moscow, Russia.
Andrei S ChaginInstitute of Regenerative Medicine, I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University (Sechenov University), 119991 Moscow, Russia.
Sechenov University · RU

Funding

Russian Science Foundation 19-15-00241
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Articular cartilage is a highly organized tissue that has a limited ability to heal. Tissue engineering is actively exploited for joint tissue reconstruction in numerous cases of articular cartilage degeneration associated with trauma, arthrosis, rheumatoid arthritis, and osteoarthritis. However, the optimal scaffolds for cartilage repair are not yet identified. Here we have directly compared five various scaffolds, namely collagen-I membrane, collagen-II membrane, decellularized cartilage, a cellulose-based implant, and commercially available Chondro-Gide

Indexed as

Prosthesis ImplantationAnimalsFibrillar CollagensHyaline CartilageKnee JointMaleOsteogenesisRatsRats, WistarSOX9 Transcription FactorTissue ScaffoldsFibrillar CollagensSOX9 Transcription Factorarticular cartilagecellulosecollagen membranedecellularized cartilagefull-thickness defectscaffold

Identifiers

PMID35008719
PMCPMC8745283
OpenAlexW4200395925

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.