Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35008359›Full record

ReviewCancers2021

The Role of Dielectrophoresis for Cancer Diagnosis and Prognosis.

Giorgio Ivan Russo, Nicolò Musso, Alessandra Romano, Giuseppe Caruso, Salvatore Petralia, Luca Lanzanò, Giuseppe Broggi, Massimo Camarda

Erratum issuedOpen access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cancers, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 38 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
38citing papers in PubMed
3.8field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

38 citing papers in PubMed, 67 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Isolation and Characterization of Circulating Tumor Cells.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2025
    Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Giorgio Ivan RussoUrology Section, University of Catania, 95125 Catania, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-4687-7353
Nicolò MussoDepartment of Biomedical and Biotechnological Science (BIOMETEC), University of Catania, 95123 Catania, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-2451-1158
Alessandra RomanoHaematological Section, University of Catania, 95125 Catania, Italy.
Giuseppe CarusoDepartment of Drug and Health Sciences, University of Catania, 95125 Catania, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-1571-5327
Salvatore PetraliaDepartment of Drug and Health Sciences, University of Catania, 95125 Catania, Italy.
Luca LanzanòDepartment of Physics and Astronomy "Ettore Majorana", University of Catania, 95123 Catania, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-6539-394X
Giuseppe BroggiPathology Section, Department of Medical, Surgical Sciences and Advanced Technologies "G.F. Ingrassia", University of Catania, 95123 Catania, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-2576-6523
Massimo CamardaSTLab s.r.l., Via Anapo 53, 95126 Catania, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-2797-8802
University of Catania · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Liquid biopsy is emerging as a potential diagnostic tool for prostate cancer (PC) prognosis and diagnosis. Unfortunately, most circulating tumor cells (CTC) technologies, such as AdnaTest or Cellsearch

Indexed as

circulating tumor cellsdetectiondielectrophoresisprognosisprostate cancer

Identifiers

PMID35008359
PMCPMC8750463
OpenAlexW4205460633

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.