Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35008332›Full record

ArticleCancers2021

Cell-Free-DNA-Based Copy Number Index Score in Epithelial Ovarian Cancer-Impact for Diagnosis and Treatment Monitoring.

Elena Ioana Braicu, Andreas du Bois, Jalid Sehouli, Julia Beck, Sonia Prader, Hagen Kulbe, Bernd Eiben, Philipp Harter, Alexander Traut, Klaus Pietzner and 9 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancers, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 39% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Double Trouble: Whole-Genome Doubling Distinguishes Early from Late Ovarian Cancer.Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

19 authors at 5 institutions in 3 countries.

Elena Ioana BraicuDepartment for Gynecology with the Center for Oncologic Surgery Charité Campus Virchow-Klinikum, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, 12169 Berlin, Germany.
Andreas du BoisDepartment for Gynecology and Gynecologic Oncology, Kliniken Essen-Mitte, 45136 Essen, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-8477-506X
Jalid SehouliDepartment for Gynecology with the Center for Oncologic Surgery Charité Campus Virchow-Klinikum, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, 12169 Berlin, Germany.
Julia BeckChronix Biomedical GmbH, 37079 Goettingen, Germany.
Sonia PraderDepartment for Gynecology and Gynecologic Oncology, Kliniken Essen-Mitte, 45136 Essen, Germany.
Hagen KulbeDepartment for Gynecology with the Center for Oncologic Surgery Charité Campus Virchow-Klinikum, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, 12169 Berlin, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-4367-289X
Bernd EibenLiquid Biopsy Center GmbH, 37075 Goettingen, Germany.
Philipp HarterDepartment for Gynecology and Gynecologic Oncology, Kliniken Essen-Mitte, 45136 Essen, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-9663-5005
Alexander TrautDepartment for Gynecology and Gynecologic Oncology, Kliniken Essen-Mitte, 45136 Essen, Germany.
Klaus PietznerDepartment for Gynecology with the Center for Oncologic Surgery Charité Campus Virchow-Klinikum, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, 12169 Berlin, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-2056-1668
Ralf GlaubitzLiquid Biopsy Center GmbH, 37075 Goettingen, Germany.
Beyhan AtasevenDepartment for Gynecology and Gynecologic Oncology, Kliniken Essen-Mitte, 45136 Essen, Germany.
Radoslav ChekerovDepartment for Gynecology with the Center for Oncologic Surgery Charité Campus Virchow-Klinikum, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, 12169 Berlin, Germany.
Christoph KeckAmedes Genetics, 30625 Hannover, Germany.
Thomas WinklerLiquid Biopsy Center GmbH, 37075 Goettingen, Germany.
Sebastian HeikausCenter for Pathology, Kliniken Essen-Mitte, 45122 Essen, Germany.
Peggy GellendinDepartment for Gynecology with the Center for Oncologic Surgery Charité Campus Virchow-Klinikum, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, 12169 Berlin, Germany.
Ekkehard SchützChronix Biomedical GmbH, 37079 Goettingen, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-9639-4870
Florian HeitzDepartment for Gynecology with the Center for Oncologic Surgery Charité Campus Virchow-Klinikum, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, 12169 Berlin, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-2412-0352
Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin · DEAmedes Genetics (Germany) · DEKliniken Essen-Mitte · DEInnsbruck Medical University · ATLMU Klinikum · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundChromosomal instability, a hallmark of cancer, results in changes in the copy number state. These deviant copy number states can be detected in the cell-free DNA (cfDNA) and provide a quantitative measure of the ctDNA levels by converting cfDNA next-generation sequencing results into a genome-wide copy number instability score (CNI-Score). Our aim was to determine the role of the CNI-Score in detecting epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) and its role as a marker to monitor the response to treatment.

methodsBlood samples were prospectively collected from 109 patients with high-grade EOC. cfDNA was extracted and analyzed using a clinical-grade assay designed to calculate a genome-wide CNI-Score from low-coverage sequencing data. Stored data from 241 apparently healthy controls were used as a reference set.

resultsComparison of the CNI-Scores of primary EOC patients versus controls yielded sensitivities of 91% at a specificity of 95% to detect OC, respectively. Significantly elevated CNI-Scores were detected in primary (median: 87, IQR: 351) and recurrent (median: 346, IQR: 1891) blood samples. Substantially reduced CNI-Scores were detected after primary debulking surgery. Using a cut-off of 24, a diagnostic sensitivity of 87% for primary and recurrent EOC was determined at a specificity of 95%. CNI-Scores above this threshold were detected in 21/23 primary tumor (91%), 36/42 of platinum-eligible recurrent (85.7%), and 19/22 of non-platinum-eligible recurrent (86.3%) samples, respectively.

conclusionctDNA-quantification based on genomic instability determined by the CNI-Score was a biomarker with high diagnostic accuracy in high-grade EOC. The applied assay might be a promising tool for diagnostics and therapy monitoring, as it requires no a priori information about the tumor.

Indexed as

debulking surgerydisease monitoringepithelial ovarian cancerhigh-gradeliquid biopsytumor burden

Identifiers

PMID35008332
PMCPMC8750971
OpenAlexW4206401504

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.