Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35008257›Full record

ArticleCancers2021

Biomarker Testing in Older Patients Treated for an Advanced or Metastatic Non-Squamous Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer: The French ESME Real-Life Multicenter Cohort Experience.

Tina Lamy, Bastien Cabarrou, David Planchard, Xavier Quantin, Sophie Schneider, Michael Bringuier, Benjamin Besse, Nicolas Girard, Christos Chouaid, Thomas Filleron and 2 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancers, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03848052 (Epidemiological Strategy and Medical Economic), which is not on this map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03848052 recruitingnot on this map

Epidemiological Strategy and Medical Economic (ESME) Research Program / Academic Real World Data Platform: Evolution of the Therapeutic Care in Lung Cancer in France Since 2015

TypeobservationalSponsorUNICANCERRan2017 to 2026Enrolled75,000ConditionsLung Cancer
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Tina LamyDépartement D'Oncologie Médicale, Gustave Roussy, 94805 Villejuif, France.
Bastien CabarrouUnité de Biostatistiques, Institut Claudius Regaud-IUCT-O, 31059 Toulouse, France.
David PlanchardDépartement D'Oncologie Médicale, Gustave Roussy, 94805 Villejuif, France.
Xavier QuantinInstitut de Recherche en Cancérologie de Montpellier (IRCM), Inserm U1194, Université de Montpellier, Institut du Cancer Montpellier (ICM), 34090 Montpellier, France.ORCID 0000-0002-5403-3612
Sophie SchneiderService de Pneumologie, Centre Hospitalier de la Côte Basque, 64100 Bayonne, France.
Michael BringuierDépartement D'Oncologie Médicale, Institut Curie, 75005 Paris, France.
Benjamin BesseDépartement D'Oncologie Médicale, Gustave Roussy, 94805 Villejuif, France.
Nicolas GirardDépartement D'Oncologie Médicale, Institut Curie, 75005 Paris, France.
Christos ChouaidService de Pneumologie, Centre Hospitalier Intercommunal de Créteil, 94000 Creteil, France.ORCID 0000-0002-4290-5524
Thomas FilleronUnité de Biostatistiques, Institut Claudius Regaud-IUCT-O, 31059 Toulouse, France.
Gaëtane SimonDirection des Datas, Unicancer, 75654 Paris, France.ORCID 0000-0003-1317-5005
Capucine BaldiniDépartement D'Innovation Thérapeutique et des Essais Précoces (DITEP), Gustave Roussy, 95805 Villejuif, France.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundGenomic and immunologic tumor biomarker testing has dramatically changed the prognosis of patients, particularly those treated for advanced/metastatic non-squamous non-small-cell lung cancer (aNSCLC) when access to targeted agents is available. It remains unclear whether older patients have access to therapy-predictive biomarker testing techniques in the same proportion as younger patients. This study aims to compare the proportion of biomarker testing performed in non-squamous aNSCLC at diagnosis between patients aged ≥70 years old and their younger counterparts.

methodsWe conducted a retrospective analysis using the Epidemio-Strategy and Medical Economics (ESME) Advanced or Metastatic Lung Cancer Data Platform, a French multicenter real-life database. All patients with non-squamous aNSCLC diagnosed between 2015 and 2018 were selected. Biomarker testing corresponded to at least one molecular alteration and/or PD-L1 testing performed within 1 month before or 3 months after the aNSCLC diagnosis.

resultsIn total, 2848 patients aged ≥70 years and 6900 patients aged <70 years were included. Most patients were male. The proportion of current smokers at diagnosis was higher in the <70 years group (42% vs. 17%,

conclusionsAge is not a barrier to biomarker testing in patients with aNSCLC.

Indexed as

biomarker testinglung cancerolder patients

Identifiers

PMID35008257
PMCPMC8750267

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.