Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35008229›Full record

ReviewCancers2021

Fecal microRNAs, Fecal microRNA Panels, or Combinations of Fecal microRNAs with Fecal Hemoglobin for Early Detection of Colorectal Cancer and Its Precursors: A Systematic Review.

Zitong Zhao, Anna Zhu, Megha Bhardwaj, Petra Schrotz-King, Hermann Brenner

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cancers, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. miR-7847-3p Serves as a Prognostic Biomarker and Suppresses Colorectal Cancer Progression.The Turkish journal of gastroenterology : the official journal of Turkish Society of Gastroenterology · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Network approach in liquidomics landscape.Journal of experimental & clinical cancer research : CR · 2023
    Review
  15. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Zitong ZhaoDivision of Clinical Epidemiology and Aging Research, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany.
Anna ZhuDivision of Clinical Epidemiology and Aging Research, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany.
Megha BhardwajDivision of Preventive Oncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ) and National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-3699-0275
Petra Schrotz-KingDivision of Preventive Oncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ) and National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany.
Hermann BrennerDivision of Clinical Epidemiology and Aging Research, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-6129-1572
German Cancer Research Center · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the third most common cancer and the second leading cause of cancer mortality globally. Fecal miRNAs have been suggested to be promising biomarkers for CRC early detection. We aimed to conduct a systematic literature review on the diagnostic performance of fecal miRNA markers for CRC and its precursors. PubMed and Web of Science were searched to retrieve relevant articles published up to 7 December 2021. Information on study design, characteristics of study population, pre-analytics (sample collection, processing, and storage), fecal miRNA extraction and quantification technologies, and diagnostic performance (including sensitivity, specificity, and area under the curve (AUC)) were summarized. Twenty studies reporting on 31 individual miRNAs and 16 miRNA panels (with 2-9 markers) for CRC diagnosis were identified. Substantial heterogeneity existed regarding stool sample collection, processing, storage, and miRNA extraction and normalization. For two individual miRNAs and one miRNA panel, values ≥ 80% were reported for both sensitivity and specificity; however, none of these results were either internally or externally validated. In a study among fecal immunochemical test-positive cases recruited from a true screening setting, better diagnostic performance was identified and internally validated for a combination panel including two miRNAs, fecal hemoglobin level, and patient age and sex, compared with fecal hemoglobin concentration alone. Fecal miRNAs or miRNA panels, possibly in combination with fecal hemoglobin test, may be promising candidates for noninvasive CRC early detection. However, large prospective and well-designed studies in CRC screening cohorts are required to validate promising miRNAs or miRNA panels.

Indexed as

colorectal cancerearly detectionmiRNAstool

Identifiers

PMID35008229
PMCPMC8750731
OpenAlexW4200594190

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.