Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35007854›Full record

ArticleForensic science international. Genetics2022

A multi-dimensional evaluation of the 'NIST 1032' sample set across four forensic Y-STR multiplexes.

Carolyn R Steffen, Tunde I Huszar, Lisa A Borsuk, Peter M Vallone, Katherine B Gettings

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Forensic science international. Genetics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Carolyn R SteffenNational Institute of Standards and Technology, 100 Bureau Drive, M/S 8314, Gaithersburg, MD 20899, USA. Electronic address: becky.steffen@nist.gov.
Tunde I HuszarNational Institute of Standards and Technology, 100 Bureau Drive, M/S 8314, Gaithersburg, MD 20899, USA.
Lisa A BorsukNational Institute of Standards and Technology, 100 Bureau Drive, M/S 8314, Gaithersburg, MD 20899, USA.
Peter M ValloneNational Institute of Standards and Technology, 100 Bureau Drive, M/S 8314, Gaithersburg, MD 20899, USA.
Katherine B GettingsNational Institute of Standards and Technology, 100 Bureau Drive, M/S 8314, Gaithersburg, MD 20899, USA.
National Institute of Standards and Technology · US

Funding

Intramural NIST DOC 9999-NIST
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This manuscript reports Y-chromosomal short tandem repeat (Y-STR) haplotypes for 1032 male U.S. population samples across 30 Y-STR loci characterized by three capillary electrophoresis (CE) length-based kits (PowerPlex Y23 System, Yfiler Plus PCR Amplification Kit, and Investigator Argus Y-28 QS Kit) and one sequence-based kit (ForenSeq DNA Signature Prep Kit): DYF387S1, DYS19, DYS385 a/b, DYS389I, DYS389II, DYS390, DYS391, DYS392, DYS393, DYS437, DYS438, DYS439, DYS448, DYS449, DYS456, DYS458, DYS460, DYS481, DYS505, DYS518, DYS522, DYS533, DYS549, DYS570, DYS576, DYS612, DYS627, DYS635, DYS643, and Y-GATA-H4. The length-based Y-STR haplotypes include six loci that are not reported in the sequence-based kit (DYS393, DYS449, DYS456, DYS458, DYS518, and DYS627), whereas three loci included in the sequence-based kit are not present in length-based kits (DYS505, DYS522, and DYS612). For the latter, a custom multiplex was used to generate CE length-based data, allowing 1032 samples to be evaluated for concordance across the 30 Y-STR loci included in these four commercial Y-STR typing kits. Discordances between typing methods were analyzed further to assess underlying causes such as primer binding site mutations and flanking region insertions/deletions. Allele-level frequency and statistical information is provided for sequenced loci, excluding the multi-copy loci DYF387S1 and DYS385 a/b, for which locus-specific haplotype-level frequencies are provided instead. The resulting data reveals the degree of information gained through sequencing: 88% of sequenced Y-STR loci contain additional sequence-based alleles compared to length-based data, with the DYS389II locus containing the most additional alleles (51) observed by sequencing. Despite these allelic increases, only minimal improvement was observed in haplotype resolution by sequence, with all four commercial kits providing a similar ability to differentiate length-based haplotypes in this sample set. Finally, a subset of 369 male samples were compared to their corresponding additionally sequenced father samples, revealing the sequence basis for the 50 length-based changes observed, and no additional sequence-based mutations. GenBank accession numbers are reported for each unique sequence, and associated records are available in the STRSeq Y-Chromosomal STR Loci National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI) BioProject, accession PRJNA380347. Haplotype data is updated in the Y-STR Haplotype Reference Database (YHRD) for the 'NIST 1032' data set to now achieve the level of maximal haplotype of YHRD. All supplementary files including revisions to previously published Y-STR data are available in the NIST Public Data Repository: U.S. population data for human identification markers, DOI 10.18434/t4/1500024.

Indexed as

Chromosomes, Human, YDNA FingerprintingGene FrequencyGenetics, PopulationHaplotypesHumansMaleMicrosatellite RepeatsDNA sequencingHaplotype frequencyMPSNGSShort tandem repeatY-STR typing

Identifiers

PMID35007854
PMCPMC9901497
OpenAlexW4200442662

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.