Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35007317›Full record

ArticleRevista da Escola de Enfermagem da U S P2022

Coping moderates the relationship between intolerance of uncertainty and stress in men during the Covid-19 pandemic.

Emanuel Missias Silva Palma, Anderson Reis de Sousa, Franciane Andrade de Morais, Ramon Evangelista Luz, Álvaro Lima Freitas Neto, Pâmela Pitágoras Freitas Lima

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Revista da Escola de Enfermagem da U S P, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Migrant Men Living in Brazil during the Pandemic: A Qualitative Study.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2024
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Emanuel Missias Silva PalmaEscola Bahiana de Medicina e Saúde Pública, Salvador, BA, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7376-6483
Anderson Reis de SousaUniversidade Federal da Bahia, Escola de Enfermagem, Pós-Graduação em Enfermagem e Saúde, Salvador, BA, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8534-1960
Franciane Andrade de MoraisInstituto Federal Baiano, Salvador, BA, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0389-3345
Ramon Evangelista LuzFaculdade Unidas de Pesquisas, Ciências e Saúde, Jequié, BA, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8875-1682
Álvaro Lima Freitas NetoEscola Bahiana de Medicina e Saúde Pública, Salvador, BA, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3309-8166
Pâmela Pitágoras Freitas LimaFundação Santo André, Santo André, SP, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7361-8731
Escola Bahiana de Medicina e Saúde Pública · BRCentro Universitário das Faculdades Metropolitanas Unidas · BRCentro Universitário Fundação Santo André · BRInstituto Federal de Educação, Ciência e Tecnologia Baiano · BRUniversidade Federal da Bahia · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo test the explanatory power of coping strategies and intolerance of uncertainty on men's perceived stress levels and test the moderating role of coping strategies in the relationship between intolerance of uncertainty and perceived stress during the Covid-19 pandemic.

methodThis was an online cross-sectional study in which 1,006 men living in Brazil during the Covid-19 pandemic participated. Participants were recruited using a snowball sampling technique and completed a questionnaire containing measures of all study variables. Data were examined using a correlation and a regression analysis.

resultsIntolerance of uncertainty (β = .51) and refusal (β = .15) positively predicted perceived stress, whereas control (β = -.31) and isolation (β = -.06) negatively predicted it. Together, these variables explained 52% of men's perceived stress (p < .001). Isolation and social support lessened the relationship between intolerance of uncertainty and stress (p < .001).

conclusionMen high in intolerance of uncertainty and refusal were more vulnerable to stress during the pandemic. However, coping helped mitigate the relationship between intolerance of uncertainty and perceived stress, thus being a promising psychosocial intervention in this context.

Indexed as

COVID-19PandemicsAdaptation, PsychologicalCross-Sectional StudiesHumansMaleSARS-CoV-2Uncertainty

Identifiers

PMID35007317
PMCPMC10132738
OpenAlexW4205544778

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.