Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35007139›Full record

ReviewAntimicrobial agents and chemotherapy2022

Analysis of the Clinical Pipeline of Treatments for Drug-Resistant Bacterial Infections: Despite Progress, More Action Is Needed.

Mark S Butler, Valeria Gigante, Hatim Sati, Sarah Paulin, Laila Al-Sulaiman, John H Rex, Prabhavathi Fernandes, Cesar A Arias, Mical Paul, Guy E Thwaites and 9 more

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 127 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
127citing papers in PubMed
22.2field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

127 citing papers in PubMed, 231 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Design, synthesis, and biological evaluation of tyrcinnamine derivatives as bactericides.Journal of enzyme inhibition and medicinal chemistry · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Changes in Susceptibility Profiles ofJournal of clinical medicine · 2026
    Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article

67 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

19 authors at 12 institutions in 9 countries.

Mark S ButlerMSBChem Consulting, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-6689-4236
Valeria GiganteAntimicrobial Resistance Division, WHO, Geneva, Switzerland.
Hatim SatiAntimicrobial Resistance Division, WHO, Geneva, Switzerland.
Sarah PaulinAntimicrobial Resistance Division, WHO, Geneva, Switzerland.
Laila Al-SulaimanAntimicrobial Resistance Division, WHO, Geneva, Switzerland.
John H RexF2G Limited, Eccles, Manchester, United Kingdom.
Prabhavathi FernandesScientific Advisory Committee, GARDP, Geneva, Switzerland.
Cesar A AriasCenter for Infectious Diseases Research, Houston Methodist Research Institute, Houston, Texas, USA.
Mical PaulInfectious Diseases Institute, Rambam Health Care Campus, Haifa, Israel.
Guy E ThwaitesOxford University Clinical Research Unit, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam.
Lloyd CzaplewskiChemical Biology Ventures Ltd., Abingdon, Oxfordshire, United Kingdom.
Richard A AlmCARB-X, Boston University, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-5056-7377
Christian LienhardtUniversité de Montpellier, INSERM, Institut de Recherche pour le Développement, Montpellier, France.
Melvin SpigelmanTB Alliance, New York, New York, USA.
Lynn L SilverLL Silver Consulting, Springfield, New Jersey, USA.
Norio OhmagariNational Center for Global Health and Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
Roman KozlovInstitute of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy, Smolensk State Medical University, Smolensk, Russia.
Stephan HarbarthNational Center for Infection Prevention, Swissnoso, Bern, Switzerland.
Peter BeyerAntimicrobial Resistance Division, WHO, Geneva, Switzerland.
Boston University · USGlobal Antibiotic Research & Development Partnership · CHHouston Methodist · USInserm · FRNational Center for Global Health and Medicine · JPNuffield Orthopaedic Centre · GBSmolensk State Medical University · RUTB Alliance · USTechnion – Israel Institute of Technology · ILThe University of Queensland · AUThe University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston · USUniversity Hospital of Geneva · CH

Funding

Project 3: Functional Microbiome and Host Signatures in Transition from Commensal to pathogenP01AI152999 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS HLTH SCI CTR HOUSTON · PI HAAG, ANTHONY · 2020 to 2025
$12.0M
VENOUS: A translational study of enterococcal bacteremiaR01AI148342 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS HLTH SCI CTR HOUSTON · PI ARIAS, CESAR AUGUSTO · 2020 to 2024
$3.9M
The LiaFSR system and antimicrobial peptide resistance in enterococciR01AI134637 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS HLTH SCI CTR HOUSTON · PI Cesar Augusto Arias · 2018 to 2026
$3.7M
POR Program on Genomic Prediction of Antimicrobial Resistance in VREK24AI121296 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS HLTH SCI CTR HOUSTON · PI ARIAS, CESAR AUGUSTO · 2016 to 2025
$1.5M
NIAID NIH HHS K24 AI121296NIAID NIH HHS P01 AI152999NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI134637NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI148342World Health Organization 001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

There is an urgent global need for new strategies and drugs to control and treat multidrug-resistant bacterial infections. In 2017, the World Health Organization (WHO) released a list of 12 antibiotic-resistant priority pathogens and began to critically analyze the antibacterial clinical pipeline. This review analyzes "traditional" and "nontraditional" antibacterial agents and modulators in clinical development current on 30 June 2021 with activity against the WHO priority pathogens mycobacteria and Clostridioides difficile. Since 2017, 12 new antibacterial drugs have been approved globally, but only vaborbactam belongs to a new antibacterial class. Also innovative is the cephalosporin derivative cefiderocol, which incorporates an iron-chelating siderophore that facilitates Gram-negative bacteria cell entry. Overall, there were 76 antibacterial agents in clinical development (45 traditional and 31 nontraditional), with 28 in phase 1, 32 in phase 2, 12 in phase 3, and 4 under regulatory evaluation. Forty-one out of 76 (54%) targeted WHO priority pathogens, 16 (21%) were against mycobacteria, 15 (20%) were against C. difficile, and 4 (5%) were nontraditional agents with broad-spectrum effects. Nineteen of the 76 antibacterial agents have new pharmacophores, and 4 of these have new modes of actions not previously exploited by marketed antibacterial drugs. Despite there being 76 antibacterial clinical candidates, this analysis indicated that there were still relatively few clinically differentiated antibacterial agents in late-stage clinical development, especially against critical-priority pathogens. We believe that future antibacterial research and development (R&D) should focus on the development of innovative and clinically differentiated candidates that have clear and feasible progression pathways to the market.

Indexed as

Bacterial InfectionsClostridioides difficileGram-Negative Bacterial InfectionsAnti-Bacterial AgentsDrug Resistance, Multiple, BacterialGram-Negative BacteriaHumansAnti-Bacterial Agentsantibacterial pipelineantibioticclinical trialsClostridioides difficilemycobacterianontraditionaltraditionaltuberculosisWHO priority pathogens

Identifiers

PMID35007139
PMCPMC8923189
OpenAlexW4205388647

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.