Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35006645›Full record

ReviewThe Journal of eukaryotic microbiology2022

Bacterial symbiosis in ciliates (Alveolata, Ciliophora): Roads traveled and those still to be taken.

Sergei I Fokin, Valentina Serra

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in The Journal of eukaryotic microbiology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. The ciliateWater research X · 2024
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Comparative genomic analysis of symbiotic and free-livingApplied and environmental microbiology · 2024
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Sergei I FokinUniversity of Pisa, Pisa, Italy.
Valentina SerraUniversity of Pisa, Pisa, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-2887-993X

Funding

Fondazione Cassa di Risparmio di Pistoia e Pescia - giovani@ricercascientifica2019 2019.0380H2020 Marie Skłodowska-Curie Actions 872767Università degli Studi di Pisa
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The diversity of prokaryotic symbionts in Ciliophora and other protists is fascinatingly rich; they may even include some potentially pathogenic bacteria. In this review, we summarize currently available data on biodiversity and some morphological and biological peculiarities of prokaryotic symbionts mainly within the genera Paramecium and Euplotes. Another direction of ciliate symbiology, neglected for a long time and now re-discovered, is the study of epibionts of ciliates. This promises a variety of interesting outcomes. Last, but not least, we stress the new technologies, such as next generation sequencing and the use of genomics data, which all can clarify many new aspects of relevance. For this reason, a brief overview of achievements in genomic studies on ciliate's symbionts is provided. Summing up the results of numerous scientific contributions, we systematically update current knowledge and outline the prospects as to how symbiology of Ciliophora may develop in the near future.

Indexed as

AlveolataCiliophoraBacteriaPhylogenySymbiosisCiliophoraendosymbiosisepisymbiosisEuplotesHolosporaHolospora-like bacteriamorphologyParameciumphylogenysymbionts

Identifiers

PMID35006645
PMCPMC9539572

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.