Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35006495›Full record

ArticleEmergency radiology2022

Deep learning prediction of sex on chest radiographs: a potential contributor to biased algorithms.

David Li, Cheng Ting Lin, Jeremias Sulam, Paul H Yi

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Emergency radiology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

David LiFaculty of Medicine, University of Ottawa, Roger Guindon Hall, 451 Smyth Rd #2044, Ottawa, ON, K1H 8M5, Canada.
Cheng Ting LinRussell H. Morgan Department of Radiology and Radiological Science, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, 601 N Caroline St, Baltimore, MD, 21231, USA.
Jeremias SulamDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Johns Hopkins University, Clark 320B, 3400 N Charles St, Baltimore, MD, 21218, USA.
Paul H YiUniversity of Maryland Medical Intelligent Imaging (UM2II) Center, Department of Diagnostic Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University of Maryland School of Medicine, 670 W Baltimore St, Room 1172, Baltimore, MD, 21201, USA. pyi@som.umaryland.edu.

Funding

Johns Hopkins University Malone Center Seed Grant
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDeep convolutional neural networks (DCNNs) for diagnosis of disease on chest radiographs (CXR) have been shown to be biased against males or females if the datasets used to train them have unbalanced sex representation. Prior work has suggested that DCNNs can predict sex on CXR, which could aid forensic evaluations, but also be a source of bias.

objectiveTo (1) evaluate the performance of DCNNs for predicting sex across different datasets and architectures and (2) evaluate visual biomarkers used by DCNNs to predict sex on CXRs. MATERIALS AND

methodsChest radiographs were obtained from the Stanford CheXPert and NIH Chest XRay14 datasets which comprised of 224,316 and 112,120 CXRs, respectively. To control for dataset size and class imbalance, random undersampling was used to reduce each dataset to 97,560 images that were balanced for sex. Each dataset was randomly split into training (70%), validation (10%), and test (20%) sets. Four DCNN architectures pre-trained on ImageNet were used for transfer learning. DCNNs were externally validated using a test set from the opposing dataset. Performance was evaluated using area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC). Class activation mapping (CAM) was used to generate heatmaps visualizing the regions contributing to the DCNN's prediction.

resultsOn the internal test set, DCNNs achieved AUROCs ranging from 0.98 to 0.99. On external validation, the models reached peak cross-dataset performance of 0.94 for the VGG19-Stanford model and 0.95 for the InceptionV3-NIH model. Heatmaps highlighted similar regions of attention between model architectures and datasets, localizing to the mediastinal and upper rib regions, as well as to the lower chest/diaphragmatic regions.

conclusionDCNNs trained on two large CXR datasets accurately predicted sex on internal and external test data with similar heatmap localizations across DCNN architectures and datasets. These findings support the notion that DCNNs can leverage imaging biomarkers to predict sex and potentially confound the accurate prediction of disease on CXRs and contribute to biased models. On the other hand, these DCNNs can be beneficial to emergency radiologists for forensic evaluations and identifying patient sex for patients whose identities are unknown, such as in acute trauma.

Indexed as

Deep LearningAlgorithmsFemaleHumansMaleNeural Networks, ComputerRadiographyRadiologistsAnatomyBiasChestDeep learningFairnessForensicsRadiographSex prediction

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.