Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35006336›Full record

ReviewHerzschrittmachertherapie & Elektrophysiologie2022

Late arrhythmia recurrence after atrial fibrillation ablation: incidence, mechanisms and clinical implications.

Nico Erhard, Andreas Metzner, Thomas Fink

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Herzschrittmachertherapie & Elektrophysiologie, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 45 papers, 6 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
45citing papers in PubMed, 6 pooled it
10.2field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

45 citing papers in PubMed, 6 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 70 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Observational
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Nico ErhardDepartment of Electrophysiology, German Heart Centre Munich, Lazarettstr. 36, 80636, Munich, Germany. nico.erhard@gmail.com.
Andreas MetznerDepartment of Cardiac Electrophysiology, University Heart Center, University Hospital Hamburg Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.
Thomas FinkClinic for Electrophysiology, Herz- und Diabeteszentrum NRW, Ruhr-Universität Bochum, Bad Oeynhausen, Germany.
Deutsches Herzzentrum München · DEHeart and Diabetes Center North Rhine-Westphalia · DEUniversity Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND

objectivesCatheter ablation of atrial fibrillation (AF) has become a well-established and widely used therapy, with pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) being the key modality of ablation. However, arrhythmia recurrences after PVI are common, with a relevant number of patients undergoing repeat ablation. Arrhythmia recurrence after PVI may vary regarding time point and mode of recurrence. While early arrhythmia recurrences of AF after PVI are mostly found to be the product of electrical reconnection of the pulmonary veins, the exact mechanisms of very late arrhythmia recurrence, occurring later than 12 months after successful PVI, remain unclear. This review provides an overview on the current evidence on time point and mechanisms of arrhythmia recurrence after PVI focussing on late arrhythmia recurrence. RECENT

findingsThe incidence of late arrhythmia recurrence after PVI can lie at a rate of up to 30% according to long-term follow-up studies. Mechanisms of recurrence include electrical reconnection of previously isolated pulmonary veins and development of atrial fibrosis. The use of cryoballoon ablation is likely to be more effective in reducing late arrhythmia recurrences compared to radiofrequency ablation. Novel scores such as the MB-LATER score or the APPLE score may become useful tools in predicting arrhythmia recurrence after PVI. RESULTS AND

conclusionLate arrhythmia recurrence after PVI is common and leads to a relevant impairment of long-term success. Relevant data are currently limited and exact mechanisms of arrhythmia recurrence remain unclear. Further studies are needed to elucidate pathogenetic mechanisms of late arrhythmia recurrence after PVI in order to improve treatment strategies.

Indexed as

Atrial FibrillationCatheter AblationPulmonary VeinsHumansIncidenceRecurrenceTreatment OutcomeArrhythmia recurrenceAtrial fibrillationAtrial fibrosisCatheter ablationLate recurrencesPulmonary vein isolation

Identifiers

PMID35006336
PMCPMC8873127
OpenAlexW4205886088

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.