ReviewDer Radiologe2022
[Chest X-ray: implementation and indication : Recommendations of the thoracic imaging working group of the German Radiological Society].
Review in Der Radiologe, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundEven after more than 100 years, the chest X‑ray is still an important technique to detect important pathological changes of lungs, heart and vessels in a fast and low-dose manner. For the German-speaking regions, there are only recommendations available published by the "Ständigen Strahlenschutzkommission (SSK)" regarding the indication. These recommendations are not updated on a regular basis and more recent developments are only integrated with delayed.
methodsThe chest division of the German Radiological Society has summarized their expertise for the usage and indication of the chest X‑ray. Especially within the field of oncology the usage of chest X‑ray is evaluated differently to the aforementioned recommendations; here chest computed tomography (CT) is much more sensitive for evaluation of metastasis and local invasion of tumors. Also, within the area of infectious diseases in non-immunocompetent patients, CT is the method of choice. Based on the structure of the current recommendations, many current guidelines and indications are summarized and presented within the context of the usage of chest X‑ray.
Indexed as
Identifiers
35006315What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.