Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35006304›Full record

Trial reportPsychopharmacology2022

Caffeine and attentional control: improved and impaired performance in healthy older adults and Parkinson's disease according to task demands.

Kanch Sharma, Sean James Fallon, Thomas Davis, Scott Ankrett, Greg Munro, Gary Christopher, Elizabeth Coulthard

Open access · hybridAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Psychopharmacology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Targeting the adenosine AChinese journal of traumatology = Zhonghua chuang shang za zhi · 2024
    Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Kanch SharmaReMemBr Group, Level 1, Learning & Research, Southmead Hospital, Bristol, BS10 5NB, UK. kanch.sharma@bristol.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3337-3527
Sean James FallonNational Institute for Health Research Bristol Biomedical Research Centre, University Hospitals Bristol NHS Foundation Trust and University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.
Thomas DavisReMemBr Group, Level 1, Learning & Research, Southmead Hospital, Bristol, BS10 5NB, UK.
Scott AnkrettReMemBr Group, Level 1, Learning & Research, Southmead Hospital, Bristol, BS10 5NB, UK.
Greg MunroReMemBr Group, Level 1, Learning & Research, Southmead Hospital, Bristol, BS10 5NB, UK.
Gary ChristopherFaculty of Health and Applied Sciences, University of the West of England, Coldharbour Lane, Bristol, BS16 1QY, UK.
Elizabeth CoulthardReMemBr Group, Level 1, Learning & Research, Southmead Hospital, Bristol, BS10 5NB, UK.
Southmead Hospital · GBUniversity Hospitals Bristol NHS Foundation Trust · GBUniversity of the West of England · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionCaffeine is frequently consumed to boost goal-directed attention. These procognitive effects may occur due to the adenosine-mediated enhancement of monoamines, such as dopamine, after caffeine administration. As such, caffeine's beneficial effects may be altered in conditions such as Parkinson's disease (PD). However, whether caffeine improves cognition, and at what cost, has not been experimentally established in patients with neurodegenerative disease.

methodsSingle-dose trials to probe cognitive effects of caffeine are often confounded by short-term caffeine abstinence which conflates caffeine's effects with treatment of withdrawal. Using a placebo controlled, blinded, randomised trial design, we assessed the effect of 100 mg of caffeine across well-established tasks (Choice reaction time, Stroop Task and Rapid Serial Visual Presentation Task; RSVP) that probe different aspects of attention in PD patients (n = 24) and controls (n = 44). Critically, participants withdrew from caffeine for a week prior to testing to eliminate the possibility that withdrawal reversal explained any cognitive benefit.

resultsCaffeine administration was found to reduce the overall number of errors in patients and controls on the Stroop (p = .018, η

conclusionWhen removing withdrawal effects as a factor, we demonstrate caffeine has beneficial effects on selective attention but is a double-edge sword for visual temporal attention and would need careful targeting to be clinically useful.

Indexed as

Neurodegenerative DiseasesParkinson DiseaseAgedCaffeineCognitionHumansReaction TimeCaffeineAttentionCaffeineParkinson’s diseaseWithdrawalYerkes-Dodson

Identifiers

PMID35006304
PMCPMC8799544
OpenAlexW4206358389

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.