Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35006237›Full record

ArticleJournal of vision2022

Spatial structure, phase, and the contrast of natural images.

Reuben Rideaux, Rebecca K West, Thomas S A Wallis, Peter J Bex, Jason B Mattingley, William J Harrison

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of vision, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Motion Misperception in Anisomyopia Before and After Optical Correction.Investigative ophthalmology & visual science · 2025
    Article
  6. A computational account of transsaccadic attentional allocation based on visual gain fields.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Reuben RideauxQueensland Brain Institute, University of Queensland, St. Lucia, Queensland, Australia.
Rebecca K WestSchool of Psychology, University of Queensland, St. Lucia, Queensland, Australia.
Thomas S A WallisInstitut für Psychologie & Centre for Cognitive Science, Technische Universität Darmstadt, Darmstadt, Germany.
Peter J BexDepartment of Psychology, Northeastern University, Boston, MA, USA.
Jason B MattingleyQueensland Brain Institute, University of Queensland, St. Lucia, Queensland, Australia.
William J HarrisonQueensland Brain Institute, University of Queensland, St. Lucia, Queensland, Australia.

Funding

ARBi - Assessment and Rehabilitation of Binocular Sensorimotor DisordersR01EY032162 · NEI · NORTHEASTERN UNIVERSITY · PI Peter John Bex, David G HUNTER · 2022 to 2026
$2.4M
Eye Movement Rehabilitation in Low Vision PatientsR01EY029713 · NEI · NORTHEASTERN UNIVERSITY · PI BEX, PETER JOHN · 2019 to 2023
$1.9M
NEI NIH HHS R01 EY029713NEI NIH HHS R01 EY032162
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The sensitivity of the human visual system is thought to be shaped by environmental statistics. A major endeavor in vision science, therefore, is to uncover the image statistics that predict perceptual and cognitive function. When searching for targets in natural images, for example, it has recently been proposed that target detection is inversely related to the spatial similarity of the target to its local background. We tested this hypothesis by measuring observers' sensitivity to targets that were blended with natural image backgrounds. Targets were designed to have a spatial structure that was either similar or dissimilar to the background. Contrary to masking from similarity, we found that observers were most sensitive to targets that were most similar to their backgrounds. We hypothesized that a coincidence of phase alignment between target and background results in a local contrast signal that facilitates detection when target-background similarity is high. We confirmed this prediction in a second experiment. Indeed, we show that, by solely manipulating the phase of a target relative to its background, the target can be rendered easily visible or undetectable. Our study thus reveals that, in addition to its structural similarity, the phase of the target relative to the background must be considered when predicting detection sensitivity in natural images.

Indexed as

Contrast SensitivityVision, OcularHumans

Identifiers

PMID35006237
PMCPMC8762697

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.