Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35006125›Full record

SynthesisJournal of the Chinese Medical Association : JCMA2022

Hepatitis D virus dual infection increased the risk of hepatocellular carcinoma compared with hepatitis B virus mono infection: A meta-analysis.

Tien-En Chang, Chien-Wei Su, Yi-Shin Huang, Yi-Hsiang Huang, Ming-Chih Hou, Jaw-Ching Wu

Open access · hybridAbstract readMeta-AnalysisReview
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Journal of the Chinese Medical Association : JCMA, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Observational
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Hepatitis Delta Virus and Hepatocellular Carcinoma.Pathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Review
  10. Minimally invasive surgery for hepatocellular carcinoma.Journal of the Chinese Medical Association : JCMA · 2023
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Tien-En ChangDivision of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Medicine, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan, ROC.
Chien-Wei SuDivision of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Medicine, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan, ROC.
Yi-Shin HuangDivision of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Medicine, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan, ROC.
Yi-Hsiang HuangDivision of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Medicine, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan, ROC.
Ming-Chih HouDivision of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Medicine, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan, ROC.
Jaw-Ching WuDepartment of Medical Research, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan, ROC.
National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University · TWTaipei Veterans General Hospital · TW

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundHepatitis delta virus (HDV) is a defective virus that relies on the supply of hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) from hepatitis B virus (HBV) to assemble HDV virions and infect hepatocytes. However, controversy remains in whether the presence of HDV increases the risk of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Our aim is to evaluate the influence of HDV on the risk of HCC through a systematic review and meta-analysis.

methodsA review of all English-language literature was conducted in the major medical databases using the subject search terms "hepatocellular carcinoma," "liver cancer," "hepatic tumor," and "hepatitis delta." A meta-analysis of the qualifying publications was then performed.

resultsThe meta-analysis included 21 studies, which revealed a significantly higher risk of HCC among patients with HDV/HBV dual infection (odds ratio [OR] = 2.08, 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.37-3.14, p < 0.01) compared with those with HBV monoinfection. Those with HDV/HBV dual infection remained at higher risk of HCC in the subgroup analysis, irrespective of the status of hepatitis C virus (HCV) or human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) coinfection and in different ethnicities. The HCC risk remained higher in patients with HDV/HBV dual infection with heterogeneous fibrosis stage (OR = 2.04, 95% CI, 1.31-3.17, p < 0.01). The difference in the risk of HCC between HDV/HBV dual infection and HBV monoinfection was not statistically significant in patients with cirrhosis or advanced fibrosis (OR = 1.84, 95% CI, 0.48-7.02, p = 0.37). However, this subgroup comprised only two studies.

conclusionHDV and HBV dual infection significantly increase the risk of HCC development compared with HBV monoinfection.

Indexed as

Carcinoma, HepatocellularHepatitis BHepatitis D, ChronicHumansLiver Neoplasms

Identifiers

PMID35006125
PMCPMC12755332
OpenAlexW3194854162

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.