Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35006086›Full record

Trial reportJournal of medical Internet research2022

Implementation and Evaluation of a Digitally Enabled Precision Public Health Intervention to Reduce Inappropriate Gabapentinoid Prescription: Cluster Randomized Controlled Trial.

Andre Q Andrade, Jean-Pierre Calabretto, Nicole L Pratt, Lisa M Kalisch-Ellett, Gizat M Kassie, Vanessa T LeBlanc, Emmae Ramsay, Elizabeth E Roughead

Expression of concernOpen access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of medical Internet research, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It carries an expression of concern. Cited by 7 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Audit and feedback: effects on professional practice.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2025
    Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Precision public-health intervention for care coordination: a real-world study.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2023
    Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Andre Q AndradeQuality Use of Medicines and Pharmacy Research Centre, UniSA Clinical and Medical Sciences, University of South Australia, Adelaide, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-6587-3169
Jean-Pierre CalabrettoQuality Use of Medicines and Pharmacy Research Centre, UniSA Clinical and Medical Sciences, University of South Australia, Adelaide, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-5558-8604
Nicole L PrattQuality Use of Medicines and Pharmacy Research Centre, UniSA Clinical and Medical Sciences, University of South Australia, Adelaide, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-8730-8910
Lisa M Kalisch-EllettQuality Use of Medicines and Pharmacy Research Centre, UniSA Clinical and Medical Sciences, University of South Australia, Adelaide, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-5063-6128
Gizat M KassieQuality Use of Medicines and Pharmacy Research Centre, UniSA Clinical and Medical Sciences, University of South Australia, Adelaide, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-4286-3771
Vanessa T LeBlancQuality Use of Medicines and Pharmacy Research Centre, UniSA Clinical and Medical Sciences, University of South Australia, Adelaide, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-3242-7976
Emmae RamsayQuality Use of Medicines and Pharmacy Research Centre, UniSA Clinical and Medical Sciences, University of South Australia, Adelaide, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-8708-5910
Elizabeth E RougheadQuality Use of Medicines and Pharmacy Research Centre, UniSA Clinical and Medical Sciences, University of South Australia, Adelaide, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-6811-8991
University of South Australia · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDigital technologies can enable rapid targeted delivery of audit and feedback interventions at scale. Few studies have evaluated how mode of delivery affects clinical professional behavior change and none have assessed the feasibility of such an initiative at a national scale.

objectiveThe aim of this study was to develop and evaluate the effect of audit and feedback by digital versus postal (letter) mode of delivery on primary care physician behavior.

methodsThis study was developed as part of the Veterans' Medicines Advice and Therapeutics Education Services (MATES) program, an intervention funded by the Australian Government Department of Veterans' Affairs that provides targeted education and patient-specific audit with feedback to Australian general practitioners, as well as educational material to veterans and other health professionals. We performed a cluster randomized controlled trial of a multifaceted intervention to reduce inappropriate gabapentinoid prescription, comparing digital and postal mode of delivery. All veteran patients targeted also received an educational intervention (postal delivery). Efficacy was measured using a linear mixed-effects model as the average number of gabapentinoid prescriptions standardized by defined daily dose (individual level), and number of veterans visiting a psychologist in the 6 and 12 months following the intervention.

resultsThe trial involved 2552 general practitioners in Australia and took place in March 2020. Both intervention groups had a significant reduction in total gabapentinoid prescription by the end of the study period (digital: mean reduction of 11.2%, P=.004; postal: mean reduction of 11.2%, P=.001). We found no difference between digital and postal mode of delivery in reduction of gabapentinoid prescriptions at 12 months (digital: -0.058, postal: -0.058, P=.98). Digital delivery increased initiations to psychologists at 12 months (digital: 3.8%, postal: 2.0%, P=.02).

conclusionsOur digitally delivered professional behavior change intervention was feasible, had comparable effectiveness to the postal intervention with regard to changes in medicine use, and had increased effectiveness with regard to referrals to a psychologist. Given the logistical benefits of digital delivery in nationwide programs, the results encourage exploration of this mode in future interventions.

Indexed as

General PractitionersPublic HealthAustraliaHumansInappropriate PrescribingPrescriptionsaudit and feedbackdigital healthdigital interventionhealth educationhealth professionalphysicianprecision public healthprimary care

Identifiers

PMID35006086
PMCPMC8787661
OpenAlexW4206727455

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.