Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35005807›Full record

ArticleHelicobacter2022

Prevalence estimates of Helicobacter species infection in pancreatic and biliary tract cancers.

Takako Osaki, Yingsong Lin, Naoki Sasahira, Makoto Ueno, Hideo Yonezawa, Fuhito Hojo, Masumi Okuda, Masato Matsuyama, Takashi Sasaki, Satoshi Kobayashi and 7 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Helicobacter, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
3.3field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. A study of the association betweenOncology letters · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Beyond the stomach: the association betweenFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2025
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Biomedical reports · 2023
    Article
  7. Review
  8. IsTherapeutic advances in chronic disease · 2023
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. BioMed research international · 2022
    Review
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors at 8 institutions in 1 country.

Takako OsakiDepartment of Infectious Diseases, Kyorin University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6430-4666
Yingsong LinDepartment of Public Health, Aichi Medical University School of Medicine, Aichi, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0214-3649
Naoki SasahiraDepartment of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Medicine, Cancer Institute Hospital of Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, Tokyo, Japan.
Makoto UenoDivision of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Medical Oncology, Kanagawa Cancer Center, Yokohama, Japan.
Hideo YonezawaDepartment of Infectious Diseases, Kyorin University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7989-9711
Fuhito HojoGraduate School of Medicine, Institute of Laboratory Animals, Kyorin University, Tokyo, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7976-5927
Masumi OkudaDepartment of Pediatrics, Hyogo College of Medicine, Hyogo, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5263-2868
Masato MatsuyamaDepartment of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Medicine, Cancer Institute Hospital of Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, Tokyo, Japan.
Takashi SasakiDepartment of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Medicine, Cancer Institute Hospital of Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, Tokyo, Japan.
Satoshi KobayashiDivision of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Medical Oncology, Kanagawa Cancer Center, Yokohama, Japan.
Shun TezukaDivision of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Medical Oncology, Kanagawa Cancer Center, Yokohama, Japan.
Kei TanakaDepartment of Internal Medicine, Tokyo Metropolitan Ohtsuka Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.
Naoaki DanDepartment of Internal Medicine, Tokyo Metropolitan Ohtsuka Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.
Sawako KurumaDepartment of Internal Medicine, Tokyo Metropolitan Komagome Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.
Naoto EgawaDepartment of Internal Medicine, Tokyo Metropolitan Matsuzawa Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.
Shigeru KamiyaDepartment of Infectious Diseases, Kyorin University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
Shogo KikuchiDepartment of Public Health, Aichi Medical University School of Medicine, Aichi, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9499-9668
Kyorin University · JPJapanese Foundation For Cancer Research · JPKanagawa Prefectural Hospital Organization · JPAichi Medical University · JPTokyo Metropolitan Ohtsuka Hospital · JPHyogo Medical University · JPTokyo Metropolitan Komagome Hospital · JPTokyo Metropolitan Matsuzawa Hospital · JP

Funding

the Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology 17H04127the Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology 21H0318the Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology 26293145
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundHelicobacter pylori infection is a well-established risk factor for gastric cancer and has been linked to other gastrointestinal diseases, including pancreatic and biliary tract cancers; however, the relevance of enterohepatic non-H. pylori helicobacters to the pathophysiology of these diseases remains unclear. MATERIALS AND

methodsWe estimated the prevalence of two enterohepatic non-H. pylori helicobacters (Helicobacter hepaticus and Helicobacter bilis) in the framework of a hospital-based case-control study involving 121 patients with biliary tract cancer, pancreatic cancer, or other gastrointestinal diseases. Bile and blood samples were collected from the patients undergoing endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography. The presence of H. bilis, H. hepaticus, and other Helicobacter spp. was examined using bacterial culture, PCR-based detection, and serological tests.

resultsCulture of Helicobacter spp. from biliary brush samples was unsuccessful. Approximately 13.0% (15/115) of the bile samples collected from patients with a variety of gastrointestinal cancers, including pancreatic and biliary tract cancers, tested positive for one of the enterohepatic non-H. pylori helicobacter species as determined by PCR. Specifically, H. bilis and H. hepaticus DNA were detected in 11 and 4 bile samples, respectively. Approximately 20%-40% of the patients tested positive for serum non-H. pylori helicobacter IgG antibodies. The seroprevalence of H. bilis and H. hepaticus in the patients without evidence of H. pylori infection appeared to be higher in the pancreatic cancer group than in the control group.

conclusionOur findings suggest a role for Helicobacter spp., especially H. bilis and H. hepaticus, in the etiology of pancreatic and biliary tract cancers.

Indexed as

Biliary Tract NeoplasmsHelicobacterHelicobacter InfectionsHelicobacter pyloriCase-Control StudiesHumansPrevalenceSeroepidemiologic Studiesbiliary tract cancerenterohepatic helicobactersHelicobacter bilisHelicobacter hepaticusHelicobacter pyloripancreatic cancer

Identifiers

PMID35005807
PMCPMC9285378
OpenAlexW4205740837

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.