ReviewBiophysics reviews2021
Graphene nanostructures for input-output bioelectronics.
Review in Biophysics reviews, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- Enabling 3D electrical stimulation of adipose-derived decellularized extracellular matrix and reduced graphene oxide scaffoldsRSC advances · 2025Article
- Innovations in graphene-based electrochemical biosensors in healthcare applications.Mikrochimica acta · 2025Review
- Bio-inspired electronics: Soft, biohybrid, and "living" neural interfaces.Nature communications · 2025Review
- Photothermal Excitation of Neurons Using MXene: Cellular Stress and Phototoxicity Evaluation.Advanced healthcare materials · 2024Article
- Multifunctional Nanomaterials for Advancing Neural Interfaces: Recording, Stimulation, and Beyond.Accounts of chemical research · 2024Review
- Neural modulation with photothermally active nanomaterials.Nature reviews bioengineering · 2023Article
- Latest advances on MXenes in biomedical research and health care.MRS bulletin · 2023Review
- AC amplification gain in organic electrochemical transistors for impedance-based single cell sensors.Nature communications · 2022Article
- Nanoenabled Bioelectrical Modulation.Accounts of materials research · 2021Article
- Electrolyte-gated transistors for enhanced performance bioelectronics.Nature reviews. Methods primers · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The ability to manipulate the electrophysiology of electrically active cells and tissues has enabled a deeper understanding of healthy and diseased tissue states. This has primarily been achieved via input/output (I/O) bioelectronics that interface engineered materials with biological entities. Stable long-term application of conventional I/O bioelectronics advances as materials and processing techniques develop. Recent advancements have facilitated the development of graphene-based I/O bioelectronics with a wide variety of functional characteristics. Engineering the structural, physical, and chemical properties of graphene nanostructures and integration with modern microelectronics have enabled breakthrough high-density electrophysiological investigations. Here, we review recent advancements in 2D and 3D graphene-based I/O bioelectronics and highlight electrophysiological studies facilitated by these emerging platforms. Challenges and present potential breakthroughs that can be addressed via graphene bioelectronics are discussed. We emphasize the need for a multidisciplinary approach across materials science, micro-fabrication, and bioengineering to develop the next generation of I/O bioelectronics.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.