ArticleCanadian journal of pain = Revue canadienne de la douleur2019
Methadone vs. morphine SR for treatment of neuropathic pain: A randomized controlled trial and the challenges in recruitment.
Article in Canadian journal of pain = Revue canadienne de la douleur, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT01205516 (Methadone in Neuropathic Pain), which is not on this map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Methadone in Neuropathic Pain
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.
- Targeting NMDA receptors in pain management: therapeutic innovations through piracetam repurposing.Naunyn-Schmiedeberg's archives of pharmacology · 2026Review
- Methadone in Cancer-Related Neuropathic Pain: A Narrative Review.Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.) · 2024Review
- Exploring the Therapeutic Potential of N-Methyl-D-Aspartate Receptor Antagonists in Neuropathic Pain Management.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024Review
- Editor's Corner: Negative Trials and Tribulations.Canadian journal of pain = Revue canadienne de la douleur · 2019Article
- Oral Methadone versus Morphine IR for Patients with Cervical Cancer and Neuropathic Pain: A Prospective Randomised Controlled Trial.Indian journal of palliative careArticle
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.