Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35005384›Full record

ArticleCanadian journal of pain = Revue canadienne de la douleur2018

Multicenter assessment of quantitative sensory testing (QST) for the detection of neuropathic-like pain responses using the topical capsaicin model.

Catherine E Ferland, Chantal Villemure, Pierre-Emmanuel Michon, Wiebke Gandhi, My-Linh Ma, Florian Chouchou, Alexandre J Parent, M Catherine Bushnell, Gilles Lavigne, Pierre Rainville and 4 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Canadian journal of pain = Revue canadienne de la douleur, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 29% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 8 institutions in 3 countries.

Catherine E FerlandQuebec Pain Research Network, Université de Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, QC, Canada.
Chantal VillemureAlan Edwards Pain Management Unit, McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, QC, Canada.
Pierre-Emmanuel MichonDivision des Neurosciences cliniques et cognitives, centre de recherche CERVO, Université Laval, Quebec, QC, Canada.
Wiebke GandhiCentre for Integrative Neuroscience and Neurodynamics, School of Psychology and Clinical Language Sciences, University of Reading, Reading, UK.
My-Linh MaResearch Centre, Shriners Hospitals for Children-Canada, Montreal, QC, Canada.
Florian ChouchouDépartement santé buccale, Faculté de médecine dentaire, Université de Montréal, Montreal, QC, Canada.
Alexandre J ParentQuebec Pain Research Network, Université de Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, QC, Canada.
M Catherine BushnellNational Centre for Complementary and Integrative Health, NIH, Bethesda, MD, USA.
Gilles LavigneQuebec Pain Research Network, Université de Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, QC, Canada.
Pierre RainvilleQuebec Pain Research Network, Université de Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, QC, Canada.
Mark A WareQuebec Pain Research Network, Université de Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, QC, Canada.
Philip L JacksonQuebec Pain Research Network, Université de Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, QC, Canada.
Petra SchweinhardtQuebec Pain Research Network, Université de Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, QC, Canada.
Serge MarchandQuebec Pain Research Network, Université de Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, QC, Canada.
Université de Montréal · CAUniversité de Sherbrooke · CAMcGill University Health Centre · CAUniversité Laval · CACentre Hospitalier Universitaire de Sherbrooke · CANational Center for Complementary and Integrative Health · USShriners Hospitals for Children - Canada · CAUniversity of Reading · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe use of quantitative sensory testing (QST) in multicenter studies has been quite limited, due in part to lack of standardized procedures among centers.

aimThe aim of this study was to assess the application of the capsaicin pain model as a surrogate experimental human model of neuropathic pain in different centers and verify the variation in reports of QST measures across centers.

methodsA multicenter study conducted by the Quebec Pain Research Network in six laboratories allowed the evaluation of nine QST parameters in 60 healthy subjects treated with topical capsaicin to model unilateral pain and allodynia. The same measurements (without capsaicin) were taken in 20 patients with chronic neuropathic pain recruited from an independent pain clinic.

resultsResults revealed that six parameters detected a significant difference between the capsaicin-treated and the control skin areas: (1) cold detection threshold (CDT) and (2) cold pain threshold (CPT) are lower on the capsaicin-treated side, indicating a decreased in cold sensitivity; (3) heat pain threshold (HPT) was lower on the capsaicin-treated side in healthy subjects, suggesting an increased heat pain sensitivity; (4) dynamic mechanical allodynia (DMA); (5) mechanical pain after two stimulations (MPS2); and (6) mechanical pain summation after ten stimulations (MPS10), are increased on the capsaicin-treated side, suggesting an increased in mechanical pain (

conclusionThese results provide further support for the application of QST in multicenter studies examining normal and pathological pain responses.

Indexed as

multicenter studyneuropathic painquantitative sensory testing

Identifiers

PMID35005384
PMCPMC8730652
OpenAlexW2898586645

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.