ArticleCanadian journal of pain = Revue canadienne de la douleur2018
Researching what matters to improve chronic pain care in Canada: A priority-setting partnership process to support patient-oriented research.
Article in Canadian journal of pain = Revue canadienne de la douleur, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 32 citations in OpenAlex.
- Access to primary care for people with chronic pain: a lived/living experience-informed mixed-methods study protocol.BMJ open · 2026Article
- Patient-Oriented Priorities for Pediatric Erythromelalgia: A Priority-Setting Process.Children (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Implementation and Effectiveness of the Power Over Pain Portal for Patients Awaiting a Tertiary Care Consultation for Chronic Pain: Protocol for a Pilot, Prospective, Cohort, Mixed Methods Study.JMIR research protocols · 2025Article
- Evaluating the impacts of patient engagement on a national health research network: results of a case study of the Chronic Pain Network.Research involvement and engagement · 2023Article
- An interdisciplinary program for familiar faces with chronic pain visiting the emergency department-randomized controlled trial.Journal of the American College of Emergency Physicians open · 2022Article
- Development of a national pain management competency profile to guide entry-level physiotherapy education in Canada.Canadian journal of pain = Revue canadienne de la douleur · 2022Article
- The lived experience of anxiety and the many facets of pain: A qualitative, arts-based approach.Canadian journal of pain = Revue canadienne de la douleur · 2020Article
- Article
- Guidance on authorship with and acknowledgement of patient partners in patient-oriented research.Research involvement and engagement · 2020Article
- Citizen and stakeholder led priority setting for long-term care research: identifying research priorities within the Translating Research in Elder Care (TREC) Program.Research involvement and engagement · 2020Article
- Healthcare provider knowledge, attitudes, beliefs, and practices surrounding the prescription of opioids for chronic non-cancer pain in North America: protocol for a mixed-method systematic review.Systematic reviews · 2018Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
16 authors at 10 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundChronic pain affects more than 6 million Canadians. Patients need to be involved in setting research priorities to ensure a focus on areas important to those who will be most impacted by the results.
aimsThe aim of this study was to leverage patient experiences to identify chronic pain research priorities in Canada.
methodThe process was informed by the James Lind Alliance. After gathering an exhaustive list of questions using surveys, town hall meetings, interviews, and social media consultations, we used a computerized Delphi with four successive iterations to select the final list of research priorities. The final Delphi round was conducted by a panel of ten patients living with chronic pain and ten clinicians from different disciplines.
resultsWe received more than 5000 suggestions from 1500 people. The Delphi process led to the identification of 14 questions fitting under the following 4 themes: (1) improving knowledge and competencies in chronic pain; (2) improving patient-centered chronic pain care; (3) preventing chronic pain and reducing associated symptoms; and (4) improving access to and coordination of patient-centered chronic pain care. Challenges included the issue of chronic pain being ubiquitous to many diseases, leading to many initial suggestions focusing on these diseases. We also identified the need for further engagement efforts with marginalized groups in order to validate the priorities identified or identify different sets of priorities specific to these groups.
conclusionThe priorities identified can guide patient-oriented chronic pain research to ultimately improve the care offered to people living with chronic pain.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.