Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35005376›Full record

ArticleCanadian journal of pain = Revue canadienne de la douleur2018

What is the relative contribution of biological and psychosocial factors to the generation of hypoxia headache?

Diletta Barbiani, Eleonora Camerone, Fabrizio Benedetti

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Canadian journal of pain = Revue canadienne de la douleur, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 27% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Positive social modeling attenuates nocebo side effects.Annals of behavioral medicine : a publication of the Society of Behavioral Medicine · 2025
    Trial
  3. Review
  4. Nocebo and the contribution of psychosocial factors to the generation of pain.Journal of neural transmission (Vienna, Austria : 1996) · 2020
    Review
  5. The need to investigate nocebo effects in more detail.World psychiatry : official journal of the World Psychiatric Association (WPA) · 2019
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Diletta BarbianiNeuroscience Department, University of Turin Medical School, Turin, Italy.
Eleonora CameroneNeuroscience Department, University of Turin Medical School, Turin, Italy.
Fabrizio BenedettiNeuroscience Department, University of Turin Medical School, Turin, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4057-1150
University of Turin · ITKing's College London · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe biopsychosocial model claims that illness is generated by both biological and psychosocial factors. Accordingly, several studies have shown that both factors contribute to the generation of pain.

aimsThe aim of the present study is to manipulate biological, psychological, and social factors in hypobaric hypoxia headache in order to understand their relative contribution to the generation of headache pain.

methodsHealthy subjects were subdivided into three groups and brought to our high-altitude labs for the assessment of hypoxia-induced headache, blood oxygen saturation (SO

resultsAlthough none of the three groups differed significantly for SO

conclusionsThese findings indicate that biological, psychological, and social factors are additive not only in the generation of headache but also for the biochemical changes related to hypoxia.

Indexed as

biopsychosocial modelcortisolcyclooxygenaseheadachehypobaric hypoxiaprostaglandins

Identifiers

PMID35005376
PMCPMC8730614
OpenAlexW2806503165

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.