ArticleCanadian journal of pain = Revue canadienne de la douleur2018
The association between pediatric chronic pain clinic attendance and health care utilization: A retrospective analysis.
Article in Canadian journal of pain = Revue canadienne de la douleur, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.
- Chronic pain-related consultations to the emergency department of children with complex pain conditions: A retrospective analysis of healthcare utilization and costs.Canadian journal of pain = Revue canadienne de la douleur · 2022Article
- Chronic pain in children and adolescents in Manitoba: A retrospective chart review to inform the development of a provincial service for pediatric chronic pain.Canadian journal of pain = Revue canadienne de la douleur · 2022Article
- Mapping the evidence and gaps of interventions for pediatric chronic pain to inform policy, research, and practice: A systematic review and quality assessment of systematic reviews.Canadian journal of pain = Revue canadienne de la douleur · 2020Review
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundPediatric chronic pain is common, disabling, and costly. Children with chronic pain have high health care utilization in that they are seen by multiple health care providers, have frequent emergency room visits, and require many diagnostic tests. Pediatric health care utilization relating to direct health care services and associated costs of attendance at chronic pain clinics in Canada has not been well described.
aimThe purpose of this project was to analyze the cost of physician services for individuals attending an interprofessional pediatric chronic pain clinic over an 8-year span including years before, during, and after treatment.
methodsPhysician claims were extracted from the Ontario Health Insurance Plan (OHIP) Claims History Database and retrospectively reviewed over 8 fiscal years for 100 new patients seen at the Chronic Pain Clinic at the Hospital for Sick Children. The utilization metrics analyzed included physician consultations and follow-up appointments, emergency room visits, lab tests, and diagnostic imaging. These data reflected 2 years prior to the first chronic pain clinic appointment, year of initial appointment, and five subsequent years.
resultsHealth care utilization based on OHIP claims related to physician services and cost analysis showed an increase during the 2 years prior to first chronic pain clinic appointment, a decrease during the year of initial appointment, and a further decrease over the subsequent 5 years.
conclusionsFurther prospective research is required to establish whether attendance at the chronic pain clinic caused the reduction in health care services and costs and, if so, to identify the effective components of treatment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.