Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35005310›Full record

ReviewKidney international reports2022

Shared Decision-Making for a Dialysis Modality.

Xueqing Yu, Masaaki Nakayama, Mai-Szu Wu, Yong-Lim Kim, Lily Mushahar, Cheuk Chun Szeto, Dori Schatell, Fredric O Finkelstein, Robert R Quinn, Michelle Duddington

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Kidney international reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 33 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
33citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

33 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Patient engagement during the transition from nondialysis-dependent chronic kidney disease to dialysis: A meta-ethnography.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2023
    Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Xueqing YuDivision of Nephrology, Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital, Guangzhou, People's Republic of China.
Masaaki NakayamaKidney Center, St. Luke's International Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.
Mai-Szu WuDivision of Nephrology, Department of Internal Medicine, School of Medicine, College of Medicine, Taipei Medical University, Taipei, Taiwan.
Yong-Lim KimDepartment of Internal Medicine, School of Medicine, Kyungpook National University, Daegu, Republic of Korea.
Lily MushaharDepartment of Nephrology, Hospital Tuanku Ja'afar, Seremban, Malaysia.
Cheuk Chun SzetoDepartment of Medicine & Therapeutics, Faculty of Medicine, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shatin, Hong Kong.
Dori SchatellMedical Education Institute, Inc., Madison, Wisconsin, USA.
Fredric O FinkelsteinYale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, USA.
Robert R QuinnDepartment of Community Health Sciences, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
Michelle DuddingtonBaxter Healthcare, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The prevalence of kidney failure continues to rise globally. Dialysis is a treatment option for individuals with kidney failure; after the decision to initiate dialysis has been made, it is critical to involve individuals in the decision on which dialysis modality to choose. This review, based on evidence arising from the literature, examines the role of shared decision-making (SDM) in helping those with kidney failure to select a dialysis modality. SDM was found to lead to more people with kidney failure feeling satisfied with their choice of dialysis modality. Individuals with kidney failure must be cognizant that SDM is an active and iterative process, and their participation is essential for success in empowering them to make decisions on dialysis modality. The educational components of SDM must be easy to understand, high quality, unbiased, up to date, and targeted to the linguistic, educational, and cultural needs of the individual. All individuals with kidney failure should be encouraged to participate in SDM and should be involved in the design and implementation of SDM approaches.

Indexed as

continuous renal replacement therapyeducationhemodialysisperitoneal dialysis

Identifiers

PMID35005310
PMCPMC8720663

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.