Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35005218›Full record

ArticleBehavior analysis (Washington, D.C.)2021

Empirically Deriving Omission and Commission Errors for Relapse Tests: A Demonstration of Reverse Translation.

Daniel R Mitteer, Brian D Greer, Kayla R Randall, Ryan T Kimball, Sean W Smith

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Behavior analysis (Washington, D.C.), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
4.1field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. The Need to Distinguish between "Lapse" and "Relapse".Perspectives on behavior science · 2025
    Article
  5. Resurgence Following Higher or Lower Quality Alternative Reinforcement.Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior · 2024
    Article
  6. Examining resurgence in rats following expanded-operant treatments.Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior · 2023
    Article
  7. Relapse and its mitigation: Toward behavioral inoculation.Journal of applied behavior analysis · 2023
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Daniel R MitteerUniversity of Nebraska Medical Center's Munroe-Meyer Institute.ORCID 0000-0001-8940-0657
Brian D GreerChildren's Specialized Hospital-Rutgers University Center for Autism Research, Education, and Services (CSH-RUCARES).ORCID 0000-0001-8256-9994
Kayla R RandallUniversity of Nebraska Medical Center's Munroe-Meyer Institute.
Ryan T KimballUniversity of Saint Joseph.
Sean W SmithUniversity of Nebraska Medical Center's Munroe-Meyer Institute.
Nebraska Medical Center · USRutgers, The State University of New Jersey · US

Funding

Basic and Clinical Studies in Reinforcing Positive Behaviors in Intellectual and Developmental DisabilitiesR01HD093734 · NICHD · UTAH STATE UNIVERSITY · PI Timothy A Shahan · 2018 to 2026
$5.2M
Stimulus Control Refinements of Functional Communication Training in IDR01HD079113 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA MEDICAL CENTER · PI FISHER, WAYNE WILLIAM · 2014 to 2023
$4.5M
Preventing relapse of destructive behavior using behavioral momentum theoryR01HD083214 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA MEDICAL CENTER · PI FISHER, WAYNE WILLIAM · 2015 to 2019
$2.2M
NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD079113NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD083214NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD093734
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Most studies examine treatment relapse by programming contextual changes with perfect treatment integrity or with omission errors in the absence of a context change (i.e., all alternative responses placed on extinction). Recently, Mitteer et al. (2018) examined caregiver behavior in response to a confederate playing the role of a child with destructive behavior, providing the opportunity for researchers to empirically derive reinforcement schedules and test caregiver error patterns within future relapse tests with children. The present study represents a pilot demonstration of methods for reverse translating findings from caregivers to relapse preparations with children. We used a human-operant arrangement with three children with autism spectrum disorder in which they (a) emitted a target response (i.e., pad touch) for a preferred item in a home-like context, (b) emitted an alternative response (e.g., card touch) for the item in a clinic context while the target response was extinguished, and (c) experienced a relapse test in which the experimenter programmed the same low-rate omission and commission errors that caregivers made in the prior study within the home-like context. During the relapse test, target responding approximated or exceeded baseline ranges for all cases, and alternative behavior extinguished for two of the three cases. We discuss how researchers might incorporate similar translation processes in future relapse research.

Indexed as

reacquisitionrenewalresurgencetreatment integritytreatment relapse

Identifiers

PMID35005218
PMCPMC8740961
OpenAlexW3215098894

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.