Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35005204›Full record

ArticleAlzheimer's & dementia (New York, N. Y.)2021

Reproducibility and replicability of high-frequency, in-home digital biomarkers in reducing sample sizes for clinical trials.

Chao-Yi Wu, Zachary Beattie, Nora Mattek, Nicole Sharma, Jeffrey Kaye, Hiroko H Dodge

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Alzheimer's & dementia (New York, N. Y.), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Developing digital health technologies for frontotemporal degeneration.Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association · 2025
    Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Chao-Yi WuDepartment of Neurology Oregon Health & Science University (OHSU) Portland Oregon USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2187-6509
Zachary BeattieDepartment of Neurology Oregon Health & Science University (OHSU) Portland Oregon USA.
Nora MattekDepartment of Neurology Oregon Health & Science University (OHSU) Portland Oregon USA.
Nicole SharmaDepartment of Neurology Oregon Health & Science University (OHSU) Portland Oregon USA.
Jeffrey KayeDepartment of Neurology Oregon Health & Science University (OHSU) Portland Oregon USA.
Hiroko H DodgeDepartment of Neurology Oregon Health & Science University (OHSU) Portland Oregon USA.
Oregon Health & Science University · US

Funding

Oregon Clinical and Translational Research Institute - The National COVID Cohort Collaborative (N3C)UL1TR002369 · NCATS · OREGON HEALTH & SCIENCE UNIVERSITY · PI Cynthia D Morris, Christopher G. Slatore · 2017 to 2026
$78.4M
Research Education ComponentP30AG066518 · NIA · OREGON HEALTH & SCIENCE UNIVERSITY · PI Zachary Beattie · 2020 to 2026
$28.6M
Outreach, Recruitment and Education CoreP30AG008017 · NIA · OREGON HEALTH & SCIENCE UNIVERSITY · PI KAYE, JEFFREY A · 1990 to 2019
$27.7M
Pilot CoreP30AG024978 · NIA · OREGON HEALTH & SCIENCE UNIVERSITY · PI KAYE, JEFFREY A · 2004 to 2023
$9.0M
Resource CoreU2CAG054397 · NIA · OREGON HEALTH & SCIENCE UNIVERSITY · PI KAYE, JEFFREY A · 2016 to 2019
$7.0M
Intelligent Systems for Detection of Aging ChangesR01AG024059 · NIA · OREGON HEALTH & SCIENCE UNIVERSITY · PI KAYE, JEFFREY A · 2006 to 2010
$6.7M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR002369NIA NIH HHS P30 AG008017NIA NIH HHS P30 AG024978NIA NIH HHS P30 AG066518NIA NIH HHS R01 AG024059NIA NIH HHS U2C AG054397
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionReproducibility and replicability of results are rarely achieved for digital biomarkers analyses. We reproduced and replicated previously reported sample size estimates based on digital biomarker and neuropsychological test outcomes in a hypothetical 4-year early-phase Alzheimer's disease trial.

methodsOriginal data and newly collected data (using a different motion sensor) came from the Oregon Center for Aging & Technology (ORCATECH). Given trajectories of those with incident mild cognitive impairment and normal cognition would represent trajectories of the control and experimental groups in a hypothetical trial, sample sizes to provide 80% power to detect effect sizes ranging from 20% to 50% were calculated.

resultsFor the reproducibility, identical DISCUSSION: Reproducibility and replicability of digital biomarker analyses are feasible and encouraged to establish the reliability of findings.

Indexed as

early preventionlinear mixed‐effect modelsmild cognitive impairmentrandomized controlled trialstechnology assessment

Identifiers

PMID35005204
PMCPMC8719347
OpenAlexW4205092819

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.