Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35005203›Full record

ArticleAlzheimer's & dementia (New York, N. Y.)2021

Eye movements in frontotemporal dementia: Abnormalities of fixation, saccades and anti-saccades.

Lucy L Russell, Caroline V Greaves, Rhian S Convery, Martina Bocchetta, Jason D Warren, Diego Kaski, Jonathan D Rohrer

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Alzheimer's & dementia (New York, N. Y.), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. A novel eye-tracking digital marker outperforms plasma biomarkers in detecting cognitive impairment.Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association · 2026
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. A Perspective: Challenges in Dementia Research.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2022
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Lucy L RussellDementia Research Centre, Department of Neurodegenerative Disease UCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology London UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5023-5893
Caroline V GreavesDementia Research Centre, Department of Neurodegenerative Disease UCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology London UK.
Rhian S ConveryDementia Research Centre, Department of Neurodegenerative Disease UCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology London UK.
Martina BocchettaDementia Research Centre, Department of Neurodegenerative Disease UCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology London UK.
Jason D WarrenDementia Research Centre, Department of Neurodegenerative Disease UCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology London UK.
Diego KaskiCentre for Vestibular and Behavioural Neurosciences, Department of Clinical and Motor Neurosciences UCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology London UK.
Jonathan D RohrerDementia Research Centre, Department of Neurodegenerative Disease UCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology London UK.
UK Dementia Research Institute · GBCenter for Neurosciences · US

Funding

Medical Research Council MR/J009482/1Medical Research Council MR/M008525/1Medical Research Council MR/M023664/1Medical Research Council MR/T046015/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionOculomotor function has not been systematically studied in frontotemporal dementia (FTD) and yet may offer a simple target to monitor disease activity.

methodsWe assessed fixation stability, smooth pursuit, pro-saccades, and anti-saccades using the Eyelink 1000-plus eye-tracker in 19 individuals with behavioral variant FTD (bvFTD) and 22 controls. Neuroanatomical correlates were assessed using a region of interest magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) analysis.

resultsMeasures of fixation stability were impaired in the bvFTD group compared with controls. However, performance did not differ from controls in the pro-saccade tasks except in the vertical overlap condition. The bvFTD group performed worse in the anti-saccade task, which correlated strongly with executive function. Neural correlates included the orbitofrontal and ventromedial prefrontal cortices and striatum for fixation stability, and the dorsolateral prefrontal and parietal cortices and striatum for anti-saccades. DISCUSSION: Overall, oculomotor function is abnormal in bvFTD, with performance likely related to impairment of inhibitory control and executive dysfunction.

Indexed as

anti‐saccadesbehavioral variant frontotemporal dementiaeye‐trackingfixationsoculomotor functionpursuitsaccades

Identifiers

PMID35005203
PMCPMC8719345
OpenAlexW4205466806

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.