ArticleGynecologic oncology reports2022
Transcriptomic analysis of patient plasma reveals circulating miR200c as a potential biomarker for high-grade serous ovarian cancer.
Article in Gynecologic oncology reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- Circulating microRNAs for Early Diagnosis of Ovarian Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Biomolecules · 2023Pooled it
- The updated role of exosomes in cancer diagnosis and therapy.Discover oncology · 2026Review
- Harnessing plasma transcriptomics for non-invasive cancer biomarker identification: a comprehensive review.Discover oncology · 2025Review
- Circulating microRNAs as Diagnostic Biomarkers to Detect Specific Stages of Ovarian Cancer: A Comprehensive Meta-Analysis.Cancers · 2024Review
- Diagnostic and Therapeutic Potential of Circulating-Free DNA and Cell-Free RNA in Cancer Management.Biomedicines · 2022Review
- Diagnosis accuracy of the miR-200 family tumor marker series in ovarian cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Translational cancer research · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundHigh-grade serous tubo-ovarian cancer (HGSC) is the most common histological subtype of epithelial ovarian cancer, and highly lethal. Currently there is no effective screening test and prognosis is poor as the majority of cases are diagnosed at the advanced stage. Cell free RNAs including microRNAs (miRNAs) are dysregulated in ovarian cancer tissue and are detectable in the circulation. This study aimed to determine whether circulating cell free miRNAs may be potential biomarkers for the detection of HGSC.
methodsPlasma was collected from women with HGSC (Grade 3, n = 24), and benign ovarian masses (n = 24). RNA was extracted from patient plasma and subjected to miRNA targeted next generation sequencing (NGS). A subsequent validation cohort was assessed using plasma collected from women with HGSC (n = 14) and controls (with a benign ovarian mass; n = 15). RNA was extracted and assessed using quantitative RT-PCR.
resultsDifferential gene expression (DGE) of the NGS data revealed a significant increase in the miRNA, miR200c, in the circulation of women with HGSC (p less than 0.05) compared to controls. In the validation cohort miR200c expression by qPCR was found to also be increased in the circulation of women with HGSC compared to controls (p = 0.0023).
conclusionsCirculating miR200c may be a promising candidate biomarker for the detection of HGSC. Further larger cohort studies exploring earlier stages are needed to determine whether circulating miR200c may be a sensitive and specific biomarker of tubo-ovarian cancer.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.