Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35005065›Full record

ArticleMovement disorders clinical practice2022

Subthalamic Nucleus Stimulation in Parkinson's Disease: 5-Year Extension Study of a Randomized Trial.

Silje Bjerknes, Mathias Toft, Reidun Brandt, Trine Waage Rygvold, Ane Konglund, Espen Dietrichs, Stein Andersson, Inger Marie Skogseid

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Movement disorders clinical practice, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Observational
  7. The effects of deep brain stimulation on sleep: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Sleep advances : a journal of the Sleep Research Society · 2024
    Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Silje BjerknesDepartment of Neurology Oslo University Hospital Oslo Norway.
Mathias ToftDepartment of Neurology Oslo University Hospital Oslo Norway.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6723-6865
Reidun BrandtDepartment of Psychology University of Oslo Oslo Norway.
Trine Waage RygvoldDepartment of Psychology University of Oslo Oslo Norway.
Ane KonglundDepartment of Neurosurgery Oslo University Hospital Oslo Norway.
Espen DietrichsDepartment of Neurology Oslo University Hospital Oslo Norway.
Stein AnderssonDepartment of Psychology University of Oslo Oslo Norway.
Inger Marie SkogseidDepartment of Neurology Oslo University Hospital Oslo Norway.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn Parkinson's disease (PD) long-term motor outcomes of subthalamic nucleus deep brain stimulation (STN-DBS) are well documented, while comprehensive reports on non-motor outcomes are fewer and less consistent.

objectiveTo report motor and non-motor symptoms after 5-years of STN-DBS.

methodsWe performed an open 5-year extension study of a randomized trial that compared intraoperative verification versus mapping of STN using microelectrode recordings. Changes from preoperative to 5-years of STN-DBS were evaluated for motor and non-motor symptoms (MDS-UPDRS I-IV), sleep disturbances (PDSS), autonomic symptoms (Scopa-Aut), quality of life (PDQ-39) and cognition through a neuropsychological test battery. We evaluated whether any differences between the two randomization groups were still present, and assessed preoperative predictors of physical dependence after 5 years of treatment using logistic regression.

resultsWe found lasting improvement of off-medication motor symptoms (total MDS-UPDRS III, bradykinetic-rigid symptoms and tremor), on-medication tremor, motor fluctuations, and sleep disturbances, but reduced performance across all cognitive domains, except verbal memory. Reduction of verbal fluency and executive function was most pronounced the first year and may thus be more directly related to the surgery than worsening in other domains. The group mapped with multiple microelectrode recordings had more improvement of bradykinetic-rigid symptoms and of PDQ-39 bodily discomfort sub-score, but also more reduction in word fluency. Older age was the most important factor associated with physical dependence after 5 years.

conclusionSTN-DBS offers good long-term effects, including improved sleep, despite disease progression. STN-DBS surgery may negatively impact verbal fluency and executive function.

Indexed as

cognitionlong‐termnon‐motor symptomsParkinson's diseaseSTN‐DBS

Identifiers

PMID35005065
PMCPMC8721829

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.